Coupling and Comparison of Physical Mechanism and Machine Learning Models for Water Level Simulation in Plain River Network Area

In this study, the JiaoGang Basin in the Yangtze River Delta plains of the river network area was the research object. A basin water level simulation model was constructed based on the physical mechanism model and Mike software, and the parameters were calibrated and validated. Based on the dataset produced by the physical model, three types of ML models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), were constructed, trained, validated, and compared with the physical model. The results showed that the physical mechanism model met the water level simulation accuracy requirements at most stations. In the training and validation periods, the RF water level simulation and GBDT water level simulation models had root mean square errors (RMSEs) of all stations less than 0.25 and the Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE) of all stations was greater than 0.7. The physical mechanism model and ML water level simulation models can simulate the water level in the JiaoGang Basin better. The RF and GBDT models considerably outperform the physical mechanism model in terms of the peak simulation errors and peak present time errors, and the fluctuations of the ML water level simulation models (RMSE and NSE) are minor compared to those of the physical mechanism model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142412008
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coupling and Comparison of Physical Mechanism and Machine Learning Models for Water Level Simulation in Plain River Network Area

Cheng Gao, Dandan Qing, Yunzhu Liu, Qian Wang et al.
2 citations
Applied Sciences
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
0.41
article

Coupling and Comparison of Physical Mechanism and Machine Learning Models for Water Level Simulation in Plain River Network Area

Cheng Gao, Dandan Qing, Yunzhu Liu, Qian Wang, Yulong Cai, Xiaoqing Gao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this study, the JiaoGang Basin in the Yangtze River Delta plains of the river network area was the research object. A basin water level simulation model was constructed based on the physical mechanism model and Mike software, and the parameters were calibrated and validated. Based on the dataset produced by the physical model, three types of ML models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), were constructed, trained, validated, and compared with the physical model. The results showed that the physical mechanism model met the water level simulation accuracy requirements at most stations. In the training and validation periods, the RF water level simulation and GBDT water level simulation models had root mean square errors (RMSEs) of all stations less than 0.25 and the Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE) of all stations was greater than 0.7. The physical mechanism model and ML water level simulation models can simulate the water level in the JiaoGang Basin better. The RF and GBDT models considerably outperform the physical mechanism model in terms of the peak simulation errors and peak present time errors, and the fluctuations of the ML water level simulation models (RMSE and NSE) are minor compared to those of the physical mechanism model.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(24)
Australian National University (AU), Hohai University (CN), China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.