Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors

This study investigates stress recognition using galvanic skin response (GSR) and photoplethysmography (PPG) data and machine learning, with a new focus on air raid sirens as a stressor. It bridges laboratory and real-world conditions and highlights the reliability of wearable sensors in dynamic, high-stress environments such as war and conflict zones. The study involves 37 participants (20 men, 17 women), aged 20–30, who had not previously heard an air raid siren. A 70 dB “S-40 electric siren” (400–450 Hz) was delivered via headphones. The protocol included a 5 min resting period, followed by 3 min “no-stress” phase, followed by 3 min “stress” phase, and finally a 3 min recovery phase. GSR and PPG signals were recorded using Shimmer 3 GSR+ sensors on the fingers and earlobes. A single session was conducted to avoid sensitization. The workflow includes signal preprocessing to remove artifacts, feature extraction, feature selection, and application of different machine learning models to classify the “stress “and “no-stress” states. As a result, the best classification performance was shown by the k-Nearest Neighbors model, achieving 0.833 accuracy. This was achieved by using a particular combination of heart rate variability (HRV) and GSR features, which can be considered as new indicators of siren-induced stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411997
Citations
24
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors

Liudmyla Ishchenko, Volodymyr Omelchenko, Victoriia Alekseeva, Marcus Frohme et al.
24 citations
Applied Sciences
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
4.43
article

Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors

Liudmyla Ishchenko, Volodymyr Omelchenko, Victoriia Alekseeva, Marcus Frohme, Vitaliy V. Gargin, Alina Nechyporenko, Yaroslav Strelchuk
article en
24 citations

Abstract

This study investigates stress recognition using galvanic skin response (GSR) and photoplethysmography (PPG) data and machine learning, with a new focus on air raid sirens as a stressor. It bridges laboratory and real-world conditions and highlights the reliability of wearable sensors in dynamic, high-stress environments such as war and conflict zones. The study involves 37 participants (20 men, 17 women), aged 20–30, who had not previously heard an air raid siren. A 70 dB “S-40 electric siren” (400–450 Hz) was delivered via headphones. The protocol included a 5 min resting period, followed by 3 min “no-stress” phase, followed by 3 min “stress” phase, and finally a 3 min recovery phase. GSR and PPG signals were recorded using Shimmer 3 GSR+ sensors on the fingers and earlobes. A single session was conducted to avoid sensitization. The workflow includes signal preprocessing to remove artifacts, feature extraction, feature selection, and application of different machine learning models to classify the “stress “and “no-stress” states. As a result, the best classification performance was shown by the k-Nearest Neighbors model, achieving 0.833 accuracy. This was achieved by using a particular combination of heart rate variability (HRV) and GSR features, which can be considered as new indicators of siren-induced stress.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(24)
Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics (UA), Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau (DE), Kharkiv International Medical University, Kharkiv National Medical University (UA), V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Brandenburger Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kultur, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
4.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.