Reclassifying Mandarin Chinese Classifiers Based on Non-quantifiable Nouns and Quantifying Boundaries: A Century-long Study (1924-2024)

From new perspectives of non-quantifiable nouns and quantifying boundaries, this study proposes a hierarchical, dynamic, and four-layered sorting system for Mandarin Chinese classifiers (Cls): [Mandarin Chinese Cls Sub-property Cls/Kind Cls [Non-sub-property Cls [Cls for [+RB] nouns RB Cls/Individual Cls [Non-RB Cls Collective Cls Partitive Cls]][Cls for [-RB] nouns Natural Cls/Individuating Cls [Non-natural Cls Container Cls Standard Cls]]]]. This system focuses on the relation between Cls and nouns, and utilizes a unified sorting standard called 'boundaries', which renders the system more conducive to Cl research in syntax and semantics. It addresses three issues: 1. Clarifying why Kind Cls have no restrictions on nouns, whereas others do; 2. Mediating the longstanding debate on whether Mandarin Chinese nouns exhibit count-mass distinction; 3. Providing a unified explanation for why Cls like pian ‘(literally) slice’ and dui ‘heap’ belong to multiple types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Linguistics
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v16i6.22393
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reclassifying Mandarin Chinese Classifiers Based on Non-quantifiable Nouns and Quantifying Boundaries: A Century-long Study (1924-2024)

Yufeng Ruan
International Journal of Linguistics
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Reclassifying Mandarin Chinese Classifiers Based on Non-quantifiable Nouns and Quantifying Boundaries: A Century-long Study (1924-2024)

Yufeng Ruan
article en

Abstract

From new perspectives of non-quantifiable nouns and quantifying boundaries, this study proposes a hierarchical, dynamic, and four-layered sorting system for Mandarin Chinese classifiers (Cls): [Mandarin Chinese Cls Sub-property Cls/Kind Cls [Non-sub-property Cls [Cls for [+RB] nouns RB Cls/Individual Cls [Non-RB Cls Collective Cls Partitive Cls]][Cls for [-RB] nouns Natural Cls/Individuating Cls [Non-natural Cls Container Cls Standard Cls]]]]. This system focuses on the relation between Cls and nouns, and utilizes a unified sorting standard called 'boundaries', which renders the system more conducive to Cl research in syntax and semantics. It addresses three issues: 1. Clarifying why Kind Cls have no restrictions on nouns, whereas others do; 2. Mediating the longstanding debate on whether Mandarin Chinese nouns exhibit count-mass distinction; 3. Providing a unified explanation for why Cls like pian ‘(literally) slice’ and dui ‘heap’ belong to multiple types.

International Journal of LinguisticsVol. 16(6)
Nankai University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.