Fertilizer and conflicts: Evidence from Myanmar

• Analyzed effects of growing conflicts on use, responses and efficiency of fertilizer in Myanmar. • Nationally representative panel data from Myanmar and ACLED data were used. • Local conflicts raised fertilizer prices, exacerbated by distances from fertilizer import points. • Conflicts reduced fertilizer uses at both extensive/intensive margins and yield responses. • Fertilizer use efficiency significantly declined between 2020 and 2022. The number of farmers residing in fragile and conflict-affected countries is rising globally, yet the impacts of conflict on the economics of inorganic fertilizer in these settings remain poorly understood. We study how conflicts in Myanmar, combined with global fertilizer market disruptions, have affected inorganic fertilizer prices, use, response, and efficiency. We utilize unique nationally representative household panel survey data and a comprehensive approach that employs various analytical methods to examine the nexus between conflicts and fertilizer-related issues. Our findings reveal that greater intensity of violent events is associated with higher prices of major types of inorganic fertilizer, particularly in areas farther from major import locations. These price changes and increases in violent events have suppressed both the likelihood and quantity of inorganic fertilizer usage, leading to decreased rice yield responses at given nitrogen application levels. Panel stochastic frontier analyses, combined with a method addressing the endogeneity of inorganic fertilizer use, suggest a significant decline in fertilizer use efficiency each year since the onset of conflict. The increase in violent events is also associated with the reduced use of extension services, seeds from markets, irrigation, and optimal fertilizer blends, which may partly explain the diminished returns and efficiency of inorganic fertilizer use. Conflict therefore seems to be associated with a change in the economics of inorganic fertilizer use through various impact channels, affecting agricultural performance in these fragile and conflict-affected settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Policy
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102786
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fertilizer and conflicts: Evidence from Myanmar

Isabel Lambrecht, Zin Wai Aung, Ian Masias, Joanna Van Asselt et al.
4 citations
Food Policy
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.33
article

Fertilizer and conflicts: Evidence from Myanmar

Isabel Lambrecht, Zin Wai Aung, Ian Masias, Joanna Van Asselt, Joseph Goeb, Hiroyuki Takeshima, Bart Minten, May Thet Htar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Analyzed effects of growing conflicts on use, responses and efficiency of fertilizer in Myanmar. • Nationally representative panel data from Myanmar and ACLED data were used. • Local conflicts raised fertilizer prices, exacerbated by distances from fertilizer import points. • Conflicts reduced fertilizer uses at both extensive/intensive margins and yield responses. • Fertilizer use efficiency significantly declined between 2020 and 2022. The number of farmers residing in fragile and conflict-affected countries is rising globally, yet the impacts of conflict on the economics of inorganic fertilizer in these settings remain poorly understood. We study how conflicts in Myanmar, combined with global fertilizer market disruptions, have affected inorganic fertilizer prices, use, response, and efficiency. We utilize unique nationally representative household panel survey data and a comprehensive approach that employs various analytical methods to examine the nexus between conflicts and fertilizer-related issues. Our findings reveal that greater intensity of violent events is associated with higher prices of major types of inorganic fertilizer, particularly in areas farther from major import locations. These price changes and increases in violent events have suppressed both the likelihood and quantity of inorganic fertilizer usage, leading to decreased rice yield responses at given nitrogen application levels. Panel stochastic frontier analyses, combined with a method addressing the endogeneity of inorganic fertilizer use, suggest a significant decline in fertilizer use efficiency each year since the onset of conflict. The increase in violent events is also associated with the reduced use of extension services, seeds from markets, irrigation, and optimal fertilizer blends, which may partly explain the diminished returns and efficiency of inorganic fertilizer use. Conflict therefore seems to be associated with a change in the economics of inorganic fertilizer use through various impact channels, affecting agricultural performance in these fragile and conflict-affected settings.

Food PolicyVol. 133
International Food Policy Research Institute (US), Institute of Chemistry named after V.I. Nikitin (TJ), International Water Management Institute (IWMI) (LK), Michigan State University (US)
United States Agency for International Development
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.