Carbon Footprint of a Windshield Reinforcement Component for a Sport Utility Vehicle

In this study, the carbon footprint of a steel-based windshield reinforcement component assembled in a sport utility vehicle was calculated in three different stages: steelmaking, stamping, and middle-of-use. Possible solutions to decrease carbon emissions were evidenced, such as the purchasing of steel made through low-impact technologies and the exploitation of the green energy grid to power up stamping machines. The life cycle assessment methodology was used to calculate the carbon footprint. Four different steels provided by different suppliers were compared in order to highlight the greenest material for both the steelmaking and stamping processes and the best supplier from an environmental point of view. In addition, the carbon footprint related to the component weight in vehicles with different traction set-ups, i.e., internal combustion engine, mild hybrid electric, and battery electric, was reported. To reduce the carbon footprint, electric arc furnace-based steelmaking and cold stamping were the best options. In addition, component weight reduction (for instance, changing materials) allowed a decrease in fuel and/or energy consumption, with carbon footprint benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411263
Primary Topic
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Footprint of a Windshield Reinforcement Component for a Sport Utility Vehicle

Silvia Lazzari, Marcello Baricco, Mauro Palumbo, Marco Lattore et al.
Sustainability
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
article

Carbon Footprint of a Windshield Reinforcement Component for a Sport Utility Vehicle

Silvia Lazzari, Marcello Baricco, Mauro Palumbo, Marco Lattore, Michele Maria Tedesco, Federico Bruno, Paola Rizzi
article en

Abstract

In this study, the carbon footprint of a steel-based windshield reinforcement component assembled in a sport utility vehicle was calculated in three different stages: steelmaking, stamping, and middle-of-use. Possible solutions to decrease carbon emissions were evidenced, such as the purchasing of steel made through low-impact technologies and the exploitation of the green energy grid to power up stamping machines. The life cycle assessment methodology was used to calculate the carbon footprint. Four different steels provided by different suppliers were compared in order to highlight the greenest material for both the steelmaking and stamping processes and the best supplier from an environmental point of view. In addition, the carbon footprint related to the component weight in vehicles with different traction set-ups, i.e., internal combustion engine, mild hybrid electric, and battery electric, was reported. To reduce the carbon footprint, electric arc furnace-based steelmaking and cold stamping were the best options. In addition, component weight reduction (for instance, changing materials) allowed a decrease in fuel and/or energy consumption, with carbon footprint benefits.

SustainabilityVol. 16(24)
Centro Ricerche FIAT (IT), National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (IT), University of Turin (IT)
Dipartimenti di Eccellenza
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.