An argumentation theory-based assessment tool for evaluating disinformation in health-related claims
Our findings suggest that health institutions should regularly conduct workshops to strengthen public argumentation skills. Accessible online resources and the integration of argumentation theory into educational curricula are recommended to foster critical thinking and discernment of health information, promoting a more informed and engaged public.
Authors
- Sara Rubinelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-8914)
- Nicola Diviani
Institutions
- University of Lucerne (CH)
- Swiss Paraplegic Center (CH)
- Swiss Paraplegic Research (CH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Published
- 2024-12-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108622
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.13
Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung