An umbrella review on how digital health intervention co-design is conducted and described

Co-design has been suggested to improve intervention effectiveness and sustainability. However, digital health intervention co-design is inconsistently reported. This umbrella review aims to synthesize what is known about co-design of digital health interventions. We searched five databases from inception. Reviews which reported on co-design methodologies used in digital health were eligible. Information on review type, health conditions, and reported specifics of co-design were extracted and synthesized. Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR2 tool. We included 21 reviews published between 2015 and 2023. Co-design participants included patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals. The frequency and breadth of participant involvement in co-design activities were reported in less than half of reviews. Participants evaluated intervention co-design as a positive process. All reviews were rated as critically low quality. This umbrella review highlights the inconsistent reporting of co-design in digital health. Here, we emphasize the importance of creating guidelines to direct co-design activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01385-1
Citations
47
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An umbrella review on how digital health intervention co-design is conducted and described

Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell, Alicia Kilfoy, Pauline Whelan, Lindsay Jibb et al.
47 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Digital Mental Health Interventions
19.27
article

An umbrella review on how digital health intervention co-design is conducted and described

Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell, Alicia Kilfoy, Pauline Whelan, Lindsay Jibb, Ting‐Chen Chloe Hsu, Charlene H. Chu
article en
47 citations

Abstract

Co-design has been suggested to improve intervention effectiveness and sustainability. However, digital health intervention co-design is inconsistently reported. This umbrella review aims to synthesize what is known about co-design of digital health interventions. We searched five databases from inception. Reviews which reported on co-design methodologies used in digital health were eligible. Information on review type, health conditions, and reported specifics of co-design were extracted and synthesized. Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR2 tool. We included 21 reviews published between 2015 and 2023. Co-design participants included patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals. The frequency and breadth of participant involvement in co-design activities were reported in less than half of reviews. Participants evaluated intervention co-design as a positive process. All reviews were rated as critically low quality. This umbrella review highlights the inconsistent reporting of co-design in digital health. Here, we emphasize the importance of creating guidelines to direct co-design activities.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 7(1)
University Health Network (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), University of Manchester (GB), SickKids Foundation (CA), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
University of Toronto
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
19.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.