Perspectives of Canadian Plastic Surgeons on the Surgical Management of Pressure Injuries

<b>Introduction:</b> Pressure injuries, particularly among patients with spinal cord injuries and the elderly, significantly contribute to morbidity, mortality, and financial sequelae. Surgical interventions, including debridement and flaps, may improve outcomes, especially for stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This survey assesses Canadian plastic surgeons' perspectives and practices regarding the surgical management of these injuries. <b>Methods:</b> A web-based survey was distributed to 405 registered members of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons (CSPS) and remained open for a 6-week period. The 16-question survey explored management practices for pressure injuries and the training associated with resident education. <b>Results:</b> Responses from 129 surgeons (31.8%) were analyzed. Of these, 85% manage stage 3 or 4 pressure injuries, though only 67.5% performed both debridement and flap coverage. The majority believe care should ideally occur in community facilities with plastic surgery coverage rather than being centralized in academic centers, although careful patient selection, perioperative planning, and rehabilitation are critical to justify the surgical investment. Most respondents (83%) agreed that plastic surgery residents should be proficient in both debridement and flap coverage by the end of their training. <b>Conclusion:</b> The survey indicates that most surgeons prefer managing pressure injuries in facilities with adequate plastic surgery support rather than exclusively at academic centers. However, structured management pathways and enhanced training in pressure injury care remain crucial. Future healthcare policy and research should focus on improving care delivery and patient outcomes, ensuring that all facilities involved in this care are equipped with the necessary resources and multidisciplinary expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic Surgery
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503241308541
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives of Canadian Plastic Surgeons on the Surgical Management of Pressure Injuries

Erika Opingari, Romain Laurent, Alan D. Rogers, David L. Wallace et al.
1 citations
Plastic Surgery
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
1.72
article

Perspectives of Canadian Plastic Surgeons on the Surgical Management of Pressure Injuries

Erika Opingari, Romain Laurent, Alan D. Rogers, David L. Wallace, Hoyee Wan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Pressure injuries, particularly among patients with spinal cord injuries and the elderly, significantly contribute to morbidity, mortality, and financial sequelae. Surgical interventions, including debridement and flaps, may improve outcomes, especially for stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This survey assesses Canadian plastic surgeons' perspectives and practices regarding the surgical management of these injuries. <b>Methods:</b> A web-based survey was distributed to 405 registered members of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons (CSPS) and remained open for a 6-week period. The 16-question survey explored management practices for pressure injuries and the training associated with resident education. <b>Results:</b> Responses from 129 surgeons (31.8%) were analyzed. Of these, 85% manage stage 3 or 4 pressure injuries, though only 67.5% performed both debridement and flap coverage. The majority believe care should ideally occur in community facilities with plastic surgery coverage rather than being centralized in academic centers, although careful patient selection, perioperative planning, and rehabilitation are critical to justify the surgical investment. Most respondents (83%) agreed that plastic surgery residents should be proficient in both debridement and flap coverage by the end of their training. <b>Conclusion:</b> The survey indicates that most surgeons prefer managing pressure injuries in facilities with adequate plastic surgery support rather than exclusively at academic centers. However, structured management pathways and enhanced training in pressure injury care remain crucial. Future healthcare policy and research should focus on improving care delivery and patient outcomes, ensuring that all facilities involved in this care are equipped with the necessary resources and multidisciplinary expertise.

Plastic SurgeryVol. 34(1)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.