RINGS WITH COMMON DIVISION, COMMON MEADOWS AND THEIR CONDITIONAL EQUATIONAL THEORIES

Abstract We examine the consequences of having a total division operation $\frac {x}{y}$ on commutative rings. We consider two forms of binary division, one derived from a unary inverse, the other defined directly as a general operation; each are made total by setting $1/0$ equal to an error value $\bot $ , which is added to the ring. Such totalised divisions we call common divisions . In a field the two forms are equivalent and we have a finite equational axiomatisation E that is complete for the equational theory of fields equipped with common division, which are called common meadows . These equational axioms E turn out to be true of commutative rings with common division but only when defined via inverses. We explore these axioms E and their role in seeking a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. We prove they are complete for the conditional equational theory of commutative rings with inverse based common division. By adding a new proof rule, we can prove a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. Although, the equational axioms E fail with common division defined directly, we observe that the direct division does satisfy the equations in E under a new congruence for partial terms called eager equality .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Symbolic Logic
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jsl.2024.88
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rings, Modules, and Algebras
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RINGS WITH COMMON DIVISION, COMMON MEADOWS AND THEIR CONDITIONAL EQUATIONAL THEORIES

J.A. Bergstra, John V. Tucker
2 citations
Journal of Symbolic Logic
Rings, Modules, and Algebras
2.54
article

RINGS WITH COMMON DIVISION, COMMON MEADOWS AND THEIR CONDITIONAL EQUATIONAL THEORIES

J.A. Bergstra, John V. Tucker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We examine the consequences of having a total division operation $\frac {x}{y}$ on commutative rings. We consider two forms of binary division, one derived from a unary inverse, the other defined directly as a general operation; each are made total by setting $1/0$ equal to an error value $\bot $ , which is added to the ring. Such totalised divisions we call common divisions . In a field the two forms are equivalent and we have a finite equational axiomatisation E that is complete for the equational theory of fields equipped with common division, which are called common meadows . These equational axioms E turn out to be true of commutative rings with common division but only when defined via inverses. We explore these axioms E and their role in seeking a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. We prove they are complete for the conditional equational theory of commutative rings with inverse based common division. By adding a new proof rule, we can prove a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. Although, the equational axioms E fail with common division defined directly, we observe that the direct division does satisfy the equations in E under a new congruence for partial terms called eager equality .

Journal of Symbolic Logic
Swansea University (GB), Institute of Informatics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Rings, Modules, and Algebras
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.