CleftTok: An Analysis of Cleft-Related Content on TikTok

<i>Objective</i>To analyze the content and sources of TikTok posts regarding cleft conditions; to examine the quality and reliability of educational content related to cleft conditions.<i>Design</i>Cross-sectional, observational study of cleft-related TikTok content.<i>Setting</i>N/A<i>Participants</i>N/A<i>Interventions</i>N/A <i>Main Outcome Measure(s)</i>Frequencies of TikTok post likes, views, comments, shares, and saves; engagement rate; post themes; and post educational content accuracy, quality, and reliability (assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and modified DISCERN [mDISCERN] rating scales).<i>Results</i>A total of 252 cleft-related TikTok posts were reviewed. Most posts were created by family members of patients (n = 193, 76.59%), while posts from plastic surgeons were underrepresented (n = 11, 4.37%). Positive Messages were the most common video theme (n = 80; 31.75%), and 24 (9.52%) of the TikTok posts were classified as providing educational content. Plastic surgeons had the highest mDISCERN score (2.75) among all content creator categories, indicating more accurate and reliable educational content. When content creator categories were stratified by physician versus nonphysician creators, physician posts had significantly higher mDISCERN scores (<i>P</i> = .001). Despite objectively better educational content, plastic surgeons had the lowest engagement rate (1.82%), while family members had the highest engagement rate (7.04%).<i>Conclusions</i>Cleft teams should anticipate that patients and their caregivers will most likely access social media to learn more about cleft conditions and seek support. Patients and caregivers should be urged to stay cautious of the information they find online and ideally be offered reputable sources of information and support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241297557
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CleftTok: An Analysis of Cleft-Related Content on TikTok

Hailey Umbaugh, Canice E. Crerand, Mariana Arroyo, Ethan Richlak et al.
1 citations
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
0.85
article

CleftTok: An Analysis of Cleft-Related Content on TikTok

Hailey Umbaugh, Canice E. Crerand, Mariana Arroyo, Ethan Richlak, Avery Pope
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>To analyze the content and sources of TikTok posts regarding cleft conditions; to examine the quality and reliability of educational content related to cleft conditions.<i>Design</i>Cross-sectional, observational study of cleft-related TikTok content.<i>Setting</i>N/A<i>Participants</i>N/A<i>Interventions</i>N/A <i>Main Outcome Measure(s)</i>Frequencies of TikTok post likes, views, comments, shares, and saves; engagement rate; post themes; and post educational content accuracy, quality, and reliability (assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and modified DISCERN [mDISCERN] rating scales).<i>Results</i>A total of 252 cleft-related TikTok posts were reviewed. Most posts were created by family members of patients (n = 193, 76.59%), while posts from plastic surgeons were underrepresented (n = 11, 4.37%). Positive Messages were the most common video theme (n = 80; 31.75%), and 24 (9.52%) of the TikTok posts were classified as providing educational content. Plastic surgeons had the highest mDISCERN score (2.75) among all content creator categories, indicating more accurate and reliable educational content. When content creator categories were stratified by physician versus nonphysician creators, physician posts had significantly higher mDISCERN scores (<i>P</i> = .001). Despite objectively better educational content, plastic surgeons had the lowest engagement rate (1.82%), while family members had the highest engagement rate (7.04%).<i>Conclusions</i>Cleft teams should anticipate that patients and their caregivers will most likely access social media to learn more about cleft conditions and seek support. Patients and caregivers should be urged to stay cautious of the information they find online and ideally be offered reputable sources of information and support.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial JournalVol. 62(2)
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.