Specific reasons for living and suicide resilience mechanisms negatively predict suicide risk among sexual minorities

Introduction Sexual minority (SM) adults experience disproportionately high rates of suicide, yet it is not clear what protective factors offset the risk of suicide. Method A cross-sectional online survey of 564 SM adults assessed associations between suicide outcomes, suicide resilience and reasons for living (RFL). Results Survival and Coping Beliefs and Moral Objections subscales of the RFL, as well as Suicide Resilience were negatively associated with likelihood of future sucide attempts. Conclusion Suicide resilience and some RFL subscales are protective against suicide for SM adults, which not only supports the use of RFL and resilience among SM adults, but provides an empirical foundation for developing a culturally-specific RFL measure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Social Psychology
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2024.1487339
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Specific reasons for living and suicide resilience mechanisms negatively predict suicide risk among sexual minorities

Bruce Bongar, Kaela Joseph, Joshua G. Parmenter, James Michael Brennan et al.
Frontiers in Social Psychology
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Specific reasons for living and suicide resilience mechanisms negatively predict suicide risk among sexual minorities

Bruce Bongar, Kaela Joseph, Joshua G. Parmenter, James Michael Brennan, Maryke Van Zyl, Peter Goldblum
article en

Abstract

Introduction Sexual minority (SM) adults experience disproportionately high rates of suicide, yet it is not clear what protective factors offset the risk of suicide. Method A cross-sectional online survey of 564 SM adults assessed associations between suicide outcomes, suicide resilience and reasons for living (RFL). Results Survival and Coping Beliefs and Moral Objections subscales of the RFL, as well as Suicide Resilience were negatively associated with likelihood of future sucide attempts. Conclusion Suicide resilience and some RFL subscales are protective against suicide for SM adults, which not only supports the use of RFL and resilience among SM adults, but provides an empirical foundation for developing a culturally-specific RFL measure.

Frontiers in Social PsychologyVol. 2
Palo Alto University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), San Francisco VA Health Care System (US), University of Missouri (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Specific reasons for living and suicide resilience mechanisms negatively predict suicide risk among sexual minorities — Bruce Bongar, Kaela Joseph, et al. · Frontiers in Social Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS