Counter-practices: Understanding sensor datafication through subversive action

Sensors have become embedded in all kinds of environments. Their ubiquity has prompted a boom in scholarly engagement centered around the effects of digitally interconnected sensor media and the data traces they ceaselessly produce. This research generally focuses either on theoretical or philosophical macro-perspectives—approaching the topic “from above,” so to speak—or it is ethnographic, “from below,” analyzing the practices of sensory (self-)surveillance, for example in the context of the quantified self-movement. In this article, we propose a situated, praxeological approach that combines both foci: expanding on the epistemically productive concepts of glitches and breakdowns, we follow three strands of what we call “counter-practices”—hiding in plain sight, dis/simulation, and the exploitation of sensor logics—through which we explore the inherent operations of technological sensing and sensemaking. We trace these counter-practices through historic and recent contexts, considering the interrelation of bodies, media and environments, and extrapolating epistemological conclusions that are meaningful for critiquing the codes, logics, and logistics of recent sensor-media societies. Asking how certain practices elude and subvert intended processes of sensor datafication provides a methodological blueprint for media studies and cultural theory that are faced with an algorithmic and technological situation that has rendered itself largely unobservable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640241305970
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counter-practices: Understanding sensor datafication through subversive action

Max Kanderske, Christoph Borbach
6 citations
Dialogues on Digital Society
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
2.23
article

Counter-practices: Understanding sensor datafication through subversive action

Max Kanderske, Christoph Borbach
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Sensors have become embedded in all kinds of environments. Their ubiquity has prompted a boom in scholarly engagement centered around the effects of digitally interconnected sensor media and the data traces they ceaselessly produce. This research generally focuses either on theoretical or philosophical macro-perspectives—approaching the topic “from above,” so to speak—or it is ethnographic, “from below,” analyzing the practices of sensory (self-)surveillance, for example in the context of the quantified self-movement. In this article, we propose a situated, praxeological approach that combines both foci: expanding on the epistemically productive concepts of glitches and breakdowns, we follow three strands of what we call “counter-practices”—hiding in plain sight, dis/simulation, and the exploitation of sensor logics—through which we explore the inherent operations of technological sensing and sensemaking. We trace these counter-practices through historic and recent contexts, considering the interrelation of bodies, media and environments, and extrapolating epistemological conclusions that are meaningful for critiquing the codes, logics, and logistics of recent sensor-media societies. Asking how certain practices elude and subvert intended processes of sensor datafication provides a methodological blueprint for media studies and cultural theory that are faced with an algorithmic and technological situation that has rendered itself largely unobservable.

Dialogues on Digital SocietyVol. 1(2)
University of Siegen (DE), Collaborative Group (United States) (US)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.