A preliminary test of ChatGPT’s ESG literacy

Purpose Motivated by recent research on the pivotal role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the interplay of financial activities and ESG issues, we examine ChatGPT’s ability to assist the public, investors, corporate boards, shareholders and companies with ESG-related issues. Design/methodology/approach We conduct a preliminary test of ChatGPT’s knowledge of ESG by feeding ChatGPT with questions from three sources: Bloomberg, Corporate Finance Institute and Alison.com. We compare ChatGPT-4o mini to random guessing, Google’s Gemini and ChatGPT-4o. We test ChatGPT-4o mini’s familiarity with Bloomberg terminal functions related to ESG. Findings We find ChatGPT’s accuracy is 100% on Bloomberg questions. We also find that ChatGPT-4o mini’s performance is slightly better than that of Gemini and ChatGPT-4o. However, we document that ChatGPT-4o mini sometimes fabricates non-existing functions, which is evidence of hallucinations, a built-in flaw of ChatGPT. Lastly, we show that ChatGPT-4o mini can analyze Bloomberg terminal screen images, assess companies’ actual ESG reports and draft CEO compensation contracts with integrated ESG metrics. Originality/value Our study is the first attempt to test ChatGPT’s knowledge in the domain of ESG. Our findings suggest the potential use of ChatGPT by the public to educate themselves on ESG issues, by investors to integrate ESG in portfolio construction, by corporate boards to incorporate ESG metrics in CEO compensation contracts, by companies to file ESG reports to regulators, by ESG-conscious shareholders to engage the management, etc.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial Finance
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-04-2024-0315
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A preliminary test of ChatGPT’s ESG literacy

Ming Ju, Wei Gao
3 citations
Managerial Finance
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
1.62
article

A preliminary test of ChatGPT’s ESG literacy

Ming Ju, Wei Gao
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose Motivated by recent research on the pivotal role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the interplay of financial activities and ESG issues, we examine ChatGPT’s ability to assist the public, investors, corporate boards, shareholders and companies with ESG-related issues. Design/methodology/approach We conduct a preliminary test of ChatGPT’s knowledge of ESG by feeding ChatGPT with questions from three sources: Bloomberg, Corporate Finance Institute and Alison.com. We compare ChatGPT-4o mini to random guessing, Google’s Gemini and ChatGPT-4o. We test ChatGPT-4o mini’s familiarity with Bloomberg terminal functions related to ESG. Findings We find ChatGPT’s accuracy is 100% on Bloomberg questions. We also find that ChatGPT-4o mini’s performance is slightly better than that of Gemini and ChatGPT-4o. However, we document that ChatGPT-4o mini sometimes fabricates non-existing functions, which is evidence of hallucinations, a built-in flaw of ChatGPT. Lastly, we show that ChatGPT-4o mini can analyze Bloomberg terminal screen images, assess companies’ actual ESG reports and draft CEO compensation contracts with integrated ESG metrics. Originality/value Our study is the first attempt to test ChatGPT’s knowledge in the domain of ESG. Our findings suggest the potential use of ChatGPT by the public to educate themselves on ESG issues, by investors to integrate ESG in portfolio construction, by corporate boards to incorporate ESG metrics in CEO compensation contracts, by companies to file ESG reports to regulators, by ESG-conscious shareholders to engage the management, etc.

Managerial FinanceVol. 51(5)
Widener University (US), Louisiana Tech University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.