Development and Validation of Course Evaluation Items: A Case Study of D University

Objectives The purpose of this study is to develop and validate course evaluation items. Methods A preliminary items were developed through literature review, member perception survey, and focus group interview. A pilot test was conducted thereafter. Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis were performed using data collected from 243 participants. Additionally, correlations between students' self-assessment and course evaluation responses were analyzed. Results Confirmatory factor analysis indicated overall good model fit and factor loadings (standardized coefficients above .842), and reliability was also satisfactory (internal consistency coefficient above .702). Additional analysis revealed statistically significant correlations between students' self-assessment and course evaluation responses (correlation above .395). Conclusions This study is significant in that it incorporated the opinions of both professors and learners during the item development phase, and the number of items was reduced while ensuring they were objective and comprehensive in content.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.23.45
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of Course Evaluation Items: A Case Study of D University

Seojin Kim, Jihyeon Jang, Hyesoo Rha
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Education and Learning Interventions
article

Development and Validation of Course Evaluation Items: A Case Study of D University

Seojin Kim, Jihyeon Jang, Hyesoo Rha
article en

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study is to develop and validate course evaluation items. Methods A preliminary items were developed through literature review, member perception survey, and focus group interview. A pilot test was conducted thereafter. Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis were performed using data collected from 243 participants. Additionally, correlations between students' self-assessment and course evaluation responses were analyzed. Results Confirmatory factor analysis indicated overall good model fit and factor loadings (standardized coefficients above .842), and reliability was also satisfactory (internal consistency coefficient above .702). Additional analysis revealed statistically significant correlations between students' self-assessment and course evaluation responses (correlation above .395). Conclusions This study is significant in that it incorporated the opinions of both professors and learners during the item development phase, and the number of items was reduced while ensuring they were objective and comprehensive in content.

Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And InstructionVol. 24(23)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development and Validation of Course Evaluation Items: A Case Study of D University — Seojin Kim, Jihyeon Jang, et al. · Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS