Global Comparison of Codes of Ethics for Nurses: A Mixed‐Method Collective Case Study Differentiating Aspirational and Mandatory Ethics

Given that this study is based on the literature, namely the codes of ethics, there is no direct/indirect involvement of patients or the public.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17557
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Comparison of Codes of Ethics for Nurses: A Mixed‐Method Collective Case Study Differentiating Aspirational and Mandatory Ethics

Minji Kim, Jiyeon Choi
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Ethics in medical practice
0.85
article

Global Comparison of Codes of Ethics for Nurses: A Mixed‐Method Collective Case Study Differentiating Aspirational and Mandatory Ethics

Minji Kim, Jiyeon Choi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Given that this study is based on the literature, namely the codes of ethics, there is no direct/indirect involvement of patients or the public.

Journal of Clinical NursingVol. 34(6)
Yonsei University (KR), Korea University (KR)
University of Patras, Università degli Studi di Udine
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ethics in medical practice
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.