Exploring the cost–carbon trade‐off in using a mixed fleet of hydrogen trucks and diesel trucks

Abstract Hydrogen trucks (HTs) offer promising potential for decarbonizing the transportation sector. Based on current technologies, they have significant advantages over electric trucks (ETs) in terms of range, refueling time, and performance in cold conditions. However, HTs are costly, and there are insufficient hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs). Gradually integrating HTs into the existing diesel truck (DT) fleet is a practical approach for many freight logistics companies. In this article, we formulate a mathematical model to route a mixed fleet of HTs and DTs, and we propose an algorithm called the curve descent search (CDS) to generate the Pareto set based on cost and carbon emissions. We find that CDS can generate better Pareto sets compared to existing algorithms in the literature. We use CDS to comprehensively explore the cost–carbon trade‐off in using a mixed fleet. This question differentiates our study from previous research and is motivated by discussions with one of the largest third‐party logistics companies in North America. Detailed experiments reveal important managerial insights, such as: (1) Achieving a significant reduction in carbon emissions (e.g., a 30% reduction compared to the current diesel fleet) does not need a very dense refueling infrastructure; (2) The cost–carbon trade‐off for mixed fleets is relatively insensitive to variations in customer density and demand, suggesting that HTs can be applicable across a wide range of scenarios (including different sectors or regions); and (3) Although ETs are cheaper to use compared to HTs, their shorter range limits their competitiveness in terms of decarbonization efficiency and customer service.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Decision Sciences
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12659
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the cost–carbon trade‐off in using a mixed fleet of hydrogen trucks and diesel trucks

Erhan Kutanoğlu, Shadi Goodarzi, Manjeet Singh, Siqiang Guo
Decision Sciences
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Exploring the cost–carbon trade‐off in using a mixed fleet of hydrogen trucks and diesel trucks

Erhan Kutanoğlu, Shadi Goodarzi, Manjeet Singh, Siqiang Guo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Hydrogen trucks (HTs) offer promising potential for decarbonizing the transportation sector. Based on current technologies, they have significant advantages over electric trucks (ETs) in terms of range, refueling time, and performance in cold conditions. However, HTs are costly, and there are insufficient hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs). Gradually integrating HTs into the existing diesel truck (DT) fleet is a practical approach for many freight logistics companies. In this article, we formulate a mathematical model to route a mixed fleet of HTs and DTs, and we propose an algorithm called the curve descent search (CDS) to generate the Pareto set based on cost and carbon emissions. We find that CDS can generate better Pareto sets compared to existing algorithms in the literature. We use CDS to comprehensively explore the cost–carbon trade‐off in using a mixed fleet. This question differentiates our study from previous research and is motivated by discussions with one of the largest third‐party logistics companies in North America. Detailed experiments reveal important managerial insights, such as: (1) Achieving a significant reduction in carbon emissions (e.g., a 30% reduction compared to the current diesel fleet) does not need a very dense refueling infrastructure; (2) The cost–carbon trade‐off for mixed fleets is relatively insensitive to variations in customer density and demand, suggesting that HTs can be applicable across a wide range of scenarios (including different sectors or regions); and (3) Although ETs are cheaper to use compared to HTs, their shorter range limits their competitiveness in terms of decarbonization efficiency and customer service.

Decision SciencesVol. 56(4)
California State University, Fullerton (US), University of Missouri–St. Louis (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.