Control of dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant volunteer soybean in corn with preemergence and postemergence herbicides

Abstract The widespread adoption of multiple-herbicide-resistant corn and soybean often causes the problem of volunteers in corn–soybean rotation, which necessitates alternative herbicides for effective management. The objective of this research was to evaluate PRE and POST herbicides labeled in corn for control of dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant volunteer soybean. Field experiments were conducted from 2021 to 2023 near Clay Center, NE. Two separate field experiments were conducted to evaluate 12 PRE and 14 POST herbicides to control volunteer soybean in Enlist® corn. Soybean resistant to dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate was planted perpendicular to corn rows to mimic volunteer soybean. Among the PRE herbicides tested, acetochlor/clopyralid/flumetsulam (1,190; 1,050/106/34 g ai ha −1 ) and acetochlor/clopyralid/mesotrione (2,304; 1,961/133/210 g ai or ae ha −1 ) provided 97% and 99% control of volunteer soybean, respectively, in 2021 and 68% and 89% control, respectively, in 2023 at 42 d after PRE. Among POST herbicides tested, 2,4-D choline (1,064 g ae ha −1 ), acetochlor/clopyralid/mesotrione (2,304; 1,961/133/210 g ai or ae ha −1 ), atrazine/bicyclopyrone/mesotrione/ S -metolachlor (2,409; 700/42/168/1,499 g ai ha −1 ), clopyralid/flumetsulam (192; 146/46 g ai ha −1 ), nicosulfuron + atrazine (34 + 1,120 g ai ha −1 ), and thiencarbazone-methyl/tembotrione + atrazine (76; 12/63 + 896 g ai ha −1 ) provided ≥97% volunteer soybean control, ≥94% density reduction, and ≥97% biomass reduction 28 d after POST herbicide application. Corn yield did not differ from the weed-free control in these treatments. The results of this study suggest that PRE and POST herbicides are available for control of dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant volunteer soybean in Enlist® corn and that careful selection of an herbicide is required based on the herbicide-resistant soybean planted in the previous year.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weed Technology
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2024.97
Primary Topic
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Control of dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant volunteer soybean in corn with preemergence and postemergence herbicides

Amit J. Jhala, Mandeep Singh
Weed Technology
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
article

Control of dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant volunteer soybean in corn with preemergence and postemergence herbicides

Amit J. Jhala, Mandeep Singh
article en

Abstract

Abstract The widespread adoption of multiple-herbicide-resistant corn and soybean often causes the problem of volunteers in corn–soybean rotation, which necessitates alternative herbicides for effective management. The objective of this research was to evaluate PRE and POST herbicides labeled in corn for control of dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant volunteer soybean. Field experiments were conducted from 2021 to 2023 near Clay Center, NE. Two separate field experiments were conducted to evaluate 12 PRE and 14 POST herbicides to control volunteer soybean in Enlist® corn. Soybean resistant to dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate was planted perpendicular to corn rows to mimic volunteer soybean. Among the PRE herbicides tested, acetochlor/clopyralid/flumetsulam (1,190; 1,050/106/34 g ai ha −1 ) and acetochlor/clopyralid/mesotrione (2,304; 1,961/133/210 g ai or ae ha −1 ) provided 97% and 99% control of volunteer soybean, respectively, in 2021 and 68% and 89% control, respectively, in 2023 at 42 d after PRE. Among POST herbicides tested, 2,4-D choline (1,064 g ae ha −1 ), acetochlor/clopyralid/mesotrione (2,304; 1,961/133/210 g ai or ae ha −1 ), atrazine/bicyclopyrone/mesotrione/ S -metolachlor (2,409; 700/42/168/1,499 g ai ha −1 ), clopyralid/flumetsulam (192; 146/46 g ai ha −1 ), nicosulfuron + atrazine (34 + 1,120 g ai ha −1 ), and thiencarbazone-methyl/tembotrione + atrazine (76; 12/63 + 896 g ai ha −1 ) provided ≥97% volunteer soybean control, ≥94% density reduction, and ≥97% biomass reduction 28 d after POST herbicide application. Corn yield did not differ from the weed-free control in these treatments. The results of this study suggest that PRE and POST herbicides are available for control of dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant volunteer soybean in Enlist® corn and that careful selection of an herbicide is required based on the herbicide-resistant soybean planted in the previous year.

Weed TechnologyVol. 39
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Control of dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant volunteer soybean in corn with preemergence and postemergence herbicides — Amit J. Jhala, Mandeep Singh · Weed Technology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS