Comparative Analysis of the Accuracy of Six Intraoral Scanners Using a Full-Arch Model

Objective: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the scan accuracy of 6 intraoral scanners (IOSs) by using a dentate model. Methods: A maxillary dentate reference model was digitized with an industrial-grade blue light optical scanner to generate a reference standard tessellation language (STL) file. The same model was digitized by using 6 IOSs (Trios 4, Trios 3, Primescan, Omnicam, Planmeca Emerald S, and Medit i700) (n=10) to generate test scan STLs. All STL files were imported into a 3-dimensional analysis software program (Geomagic Control X). Test scan STLs were superimposed over the reference STL by using the initial and best-fit alignments of the software program, and the deviations of the scans of IOS from that of the optical scanner were calculated with the root mean square (RMS) method. The average deviation method was used to define the precision of the scans. Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests were used to statistically evaluate the data (α=0.05). Results: A significant difference was observed between groups in terms of RMS values (p

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Annals of Dental Sciences
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2024.0023
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of the Accuracy of Six Intraoral Scanners Using a Full-Arch Model

Münir Demirel, Almira Ada Diken Türksayar, Faruk Emir, Gülsüm Ceylan
European Annals of Dental Sciences
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Comparative Analysis of the Accuracy of Six Intraoral Scanners Using a Full-Arch Model

Münir Demirel, Almira Ada Diken Türksayar, Faruk Emir, Gülsüm Ceylan
article en

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the scan accuracy of 6 intraoral scanners (IOSs) by using a dentate model. Methods: A maxillary dentate reference model was digitized with an industrial-grade blue light optical scanner to generate a reference standard tessellation language (STL) file. The same model was digitized by using 6 IOSs (Trios 4, Trios 3, Primescan, Omnicam, Planmeca Emerald S, and Medit i700) (n=10) to generate test scan STLs. All STL files were imported into a 3-dimensional analysis software program (Geomagic Control X). Test scan STLs were superimposed over the reference STL by using the initial and best-fit alignments of the software program, and the deviations of the scans of IOS from that of the optical scanner were calculated with the root mean square (RMS) method. The average deviation method was used to define the precision of the scans. Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests were used to statistically evaluate the data (α=0.05). Results: A significant difference was observed between groups in terms of RMS values (p

European Annals of Dental SciencesVol. 51(3)
Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi (TR), Biruni University (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.