The systematics of the European Artificial Intelligence Act in the context of the fundamental rights of the Union: the myth of the digital constitutionalism

In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) bases on data driven and machine learning have been at the centre of debates on the implications of certain uses of this technology on fundamental rights in terms of individual and social risks. At the national level, reflections on whether or not AI systems have their own ontological determinism seem to have come up against the obstacles of the staticity of constitutional frameworks that are still analogical. In the European legal order, the most disruptive digital effects of the so-called knowledge economy on the subject and his or her rights seem to be conditioned by the telos of the centrality of the human being in his/her objective-axial dimension (guarantee of the Union’s values) and subjective dimension (protection of the Union’s fundamental rights). The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act would be its most recent legal-normative concretisation, in line with other norms of secondary law that would outline the dynamics of the so-called digital constitutionalism. Received: 28 May 2024Accepted: 12 September 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deusto Journal of Human Rights
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18543/djhr.3189
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The systematics of the European Artificial Intelligence Act in the context of the fundamental rights of the Union: the myth of the digital constitutionalism

Ainhoa Lasa López
1 citations
Deusto Journal of Human Rights
Legal and Policy Issues
4.07
article

The systematics of the European Artificial Intelligence Act in the context of the fundamental rights of the Union: the myth of the digital constitutionalism

Ainhoa Lasa López
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) bases on data driven and machine learning have been at the centre of debates on the implications of certain uses of this technology on fundamental rights in terms of individual and social risks. At the national level, reflections on whether or not AI systems have their own ontological determinism seem to have come up against the obstacles of the staticity of constitutional frameworks that are still analogical. In the European legal order, the most disruptive digital effects of the so-called knowledge economy on the subject and his or her rights seem to be conditioned by the telos of the centrality of the human being in his/her objective-axial dimension (guarantee of the Union’s values) and subjective dimension (protection of the Union’s fundamental rights). The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act would be its most recent legal-normative concretisation, in line with other norms of secondary law that would outline the dynamics of the so-called digital constitutionalism. Received: 28 May 2024Accepted: 12 September 2024

Deusto Journal of Human Rights(14)
University of the Basque Country (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Legal and Policy Issues
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.