A Comparative Study of the Activated Sludge Process and Trickling Filter to Identify the System Requiring the Least Area of Land

The rising cost of land across the globe has led to economic problems. One of the challenges brought by the high land price is constructing wastewater treatment systems with a small footprint. This paper compares the design of two domestic wastewater treatment systems, the activated sludge process (ASP) and trickling filter (TF), to determine which design requires the least area of land. The conventional activated sludge process design used the ASP equation, and the TF design used Rankin's method. The results showed that both systems have good removal efficiency. The ASP has a surface area of 3864 m2, and the surface area for the TF is 5000 m2. Therefore, the ASP is the better alternative when constructing a wastewater treatment system on a small land area. Keywords: Activated Sludge, Trickling Filter, Wastewater Treatment Plants, Biological Oxygen Demand.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Science and Technology Journal
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62341/ikrc1701
Primary Topic
Technology and Security Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of the Activated Sludge Process and Trickling Filter to Identify the System Requiring the Least Area of Land

Ibtesam Habib, Rozita Omar, Khaled Shahot
International Science and Technology Journal
Technology and Security Systems
article

A Comparative Study of the Activated Sludge Process and Trickling Filter to Identify the System Requiring the Least Area of Land

Ibtesam Habib, Rozita Omar, Khaled Shahot
article en

Abstract

The rising cost of land across the globe has led to economic problems. One of the challenges brought by the high land price is constructing wastewater treatment systems with a small footprint. This paper compares the design of two domestic wastewater treatment systems, the activated sludge process (ASP) and trickling filter (TF), to determine which design requires the least area of land. The conventional activated sludge process design used the ASP equation, and the TF design used Rankin's method. The results showed that both systems have good removal efficiency. The ASP has a surface area of 3864 m2, and the surface area for the TF is 5000 m2. Therefore, the ASP is the better alternative when constructing a wastewater treatment system on a small land area. Keywords: Activated Sludge, Trickling Filter, Wastewater Treatment Plants, Biological Oxygen Demand.

International Science and Technology JournalVol. 36(1)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Technology and Security Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.