Nonlinear interaction of climate risk and stock market

This paper investigates both the direct and indirect pathways through which climate change risks influence the fossil energy stock market in China, focusing on the mediating effect of investor attention and the moderation effect of the crude oil market. Utilizing China’s daily climate risk data and energy stock return data from September 4, 2017, to June 30, 2022, we employ the partial linear function coefficient model, zero-inflated negative binomial regression, and the Bootstrap technique to unravel these complex relationships. Our analysis reveals pivotal findings: (1) Climate transition risk has a U-shaped nonlinear direct effect on fossil energy stock returns, with a critical inflection point identified at 0.3364. This risk also positively mediates the return rate by shaping investor attention. Notably, exceeding a risk threshold of 0.3 intensifies the adverse impact of oil price volatility on returns. (2) Climate physical risk does not exert a discernible direct effect or mediation on the return rate of fossil energy stocks. These insights offer a comprehensive perspective on the complex interplay between climate change risk and China’s fossil energy stock market, shedding light on the nonlinear dynamics that govern these relationships. From a practical perspective, these findings underscore the need for policymakers to design risk mitigation strategies tailored to transition risks, while investors should remain vigilant to oil price volatility when climate risk exceeds critical thresholds. • Identified a critical threshold at 0.3364 in CTR’s impact on fossil energy stocks. • Demonstrated CTR’s intensified negative impact on returns beyond a 0.3 risk level. • Showed CTR’s positive mediating effect on investor attention. • Provided a detailed nonlinear analysis of CTR and CPR’s influence on stock returns. • Revealed unexplored roles of CTR and CPR in fossil energy stock dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate Finance
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclimf.2024.100055
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonlinear interaction of climate risk and stock market

Brian M. Lucey, Shupei Huang, Haizhong An, Xin Xu
10 citations
Journal of Climate Finance
Market Dynamics and Volatility
11.29
article

Nonlinear interaction of climate risk and stock market

Brian M. Lucey, Shupei Huang, Haizhong An, Xin Xu
article en
10 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates both the direct and indirect pathways through which climate change risks influence the fossil energy stock market in China, focusing on the mediating effect of investor attention and the moderation effect of the crude oil market. Utilizing China’s daily climate risk data and energy stock return data from September 4, 2017, to June 30, 2022, we employ the partial linear function coefficient model, zero-inflated negative binomial regression, and the Bootstrap technique to unravel these complex relationships. Our analysis reveals pivotal findings: (1) Climate transition risk has a U-shaped nonlinear direct effect on fossil energy stock returns, with a critical inflection point identified at 0.3364. This risk also positively mediates the return rate by shaping investor attention. Notably, exceeding a risk threshold of 0.3 intensifies the adverse impact of oil price volatility on returns. (2) Climate physical risk does not exert a discernible direct effect or mediation on the return rate of fossil energy stocks. These insights offer a comprehensive perspective on the complex interplay between climate change risk and China’s fossil energy stock market, shedding light on the nonlinear dynamics that govern these relationships. From a practical perspective, these findings underscore the need for policymakers to design risk mitigation strategies tailored to transition risks, while investors should remain vigilant to oil price volatility when climate risk exceeds critical thresholds. • Identified a critical threshold at 0.3364 in CTR’s impact on fossil energy stocks. • Demonstrated CTR’s intensified negative impact on returns beyond a 0.3 risk level. • Showed CTR’s positive mediating effect on investor attention. • Provided a detailed nonlinear analysis of CTR and CPR’s influence on stock returns. • Revealed unexplored roles of CTR and CPR in fossil energy stock dynamics.

Journal of Climate FinanceVol. 10
Nanjing University of Finance and Economics (CN), Peking University (CN), Trinity College Dublin (IE), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
11.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.