Exploring Perceived Mattering in Physical Education Teacher Education Doctoral Students

Background : Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) doctoral programs lay the foundation for training PETE doctoral students to become PETE faculty members. Limited knowledge is available on how PETE doctoral students experience and navigate their educational doctoral programs. Purpose : This study explored PETE doctoral students’ perceptions of mattering within their doctoral programs. Methods : Data were collected through an online questionnaire and semistructured interviews with 16 doctoral students nationwide. Findings : Qualitative data analysis revealed four distinct themes: (a) faculty members can induce feelings of mattering, (b) importance grows over time, (c) peer support matters, and (d) gender and race influence perceptions of mattering. Discussion : As time passes, doctoral students’ feelings of importance grow as they take on more responsibilities. The level of support provided by faculty members and peers can strongly impact doctoral students’ perceptions of mattering. Celebrating achievements with peers can serve as a way for students to extend their self-worth. Females and historically marginalized groups may experience increased feelings of self-doubt and marginalization. Conclusion : Intentionally cultivating perceptions of mattering and acknowledging the diverse backgrounds of each student can improve the quality of a doctoral program.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2024-0131
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Perceived Mattering in Physical Education Teacher Education Doctoral Students

Kelly L. Simonton, Karen Lux Gaudreault, Victoria N. Shiver, Denis Schulz et al.
1 citations
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education
Physical Education and Pedagogy
1.15
article

Exploring Perceived Mattering in Physical Education Teacher Education Doctoral Students

Kelly L. Simonton, Karen Lux Gaudreault, Victoria N. Shiver, Denis Schulz, K. Andrew R. Richards
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background : Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) doctoral programs lay the foundation for training PETE doctoral students to become PETE faculty members. Limited knowledge is available on how PETE doctoral students experience and navigate their educational doctoral programs. Purpose : This study explored PETE doctoral students’ perceptions of mattering within their doctoral programs. Methods : Data were collected through an online questionnaire and semistructured interviews with 16 doctoral students nationwide. Findings : Qualitative data analysis revealed four distinct themes: (a) faculty members can induce feelings of mattering, (b) importance grows over time, (c) peer support matters, and (d) gender and race influence perceptions of mattering. Discussion : As time passes, doctoral students’ feelings of importance grow as they take on more responsibilities. The level of support provided by faculty members and peers can strongly impact doctoral students’ perceptions of mattering. Celebrating achievements with peers can serve as a way for students to extend their self-worth. Females and historically marginalized groups may experience increased feelings of self-doubt and marginalization. Conclusion : Intentionally cultivating perceptions of mattering and acknowledging the diverse backgrounds of each student can improve the quality of a doctoral program.

Journal of Teaching in Physical EducationVol. 45(1)
University of Wyoming (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of New Mexico (US), California State University, San Marcos (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.