Capstone design landscape review: Structures and elements

Capstone courses in engineering education represent the culmination of students' learning and serve as a pivotal step in their transition into the industry. The diversity of capstone experiences is nevertheless quite large. This paper provides a starting point for qualifying and quantifying this. It is not a critique of capstone approaches, but rather a survey of possible choices. These include the level of design vs. development work, the nature of supervision and support, the focus on engineering project processes vs. deliverables, the multi- or mono-disciplinarity of the projects, etc. By capturing and describing these, this paper will help schools articulate the purpose of capstones in their specific context(s). Providing the language to describe the current capstone landscape can then also inform future work to compare, evaluate and evolve our capstones to better address the needs of our students, industry and society at large.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18530
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Landscape Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capstone design landscape review: Structures and elements

Franz Newland, Hossam Sadek
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Urban Planning and Landscape Design
article

Capstone design landscape review: Structures and elements

Franz Newland, Hossam Sadek
article en

Abstract

Capstone courses in engineering education represent the culmination of students' learning and serve as a pivotal step in their transition into the industry. The diversity of capstone experiences is nevertheless quite large. This paper provides a starting point for qualifying and quantifying this. It is not a critique of capstone approaches, but rather a survey of possible choices. These include the level of design vs. development work, the nature of supervision and support, the focus on engineering project processes vs. deliverables, the multi- or mono-disciplinarity of the projects, etc. By capturing and describing these, this paper will help schools articulate the purpose of capstones in their specific context(s). Providing the language to describe the current capstone landscape can then also inform future work to compare, evaluate and evolve our capstones to better address the needs of our students, industry and society at large.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
York University (CA)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Urban Planning and Landscape Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.