Analysis Of The Quality Of Cognitive Test Instruments In The Islamization Of Science Program (Classical Test Theory Approach)

This study aims to analyze the quality of cognitive test instruments in the science Islamization program at Darussalam Gontor University. This type of research is descriptive quantitative with a classical test theory analysis approach that tests the level of difficulty, discriminating power and deceptive power of each question. The sample was 50 students who randomly participated in the science Islamization program. Researchers use the ITEMAN application to analyze question items. The analysis showed that of the ten questions tested, there was 1 question that was coded to be eliminated, 1 question passed without revision, and eight suggested revising some multiple-choice answer items. The alpha conbrach score shows a score of 0.5, which means it is less reliable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educan Jurnal Pendidikan Islam
Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21111/educan.v8i2.12283
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis Of The Quality Of Cognitive Test Instruments In The Islamization Of Science Program (Classical Test Theory Approach)

Taufik Rizki Sista, Ulfatun Wahidatun Nisa
Educan Jurnal Pendidikan Islam
Education and Islamic Studies
article

Analysis Of The Quality Of Cognitive Test Instruments In The Islamization Of Science Program (Classical Test Theory Approach)

Taufik Rizki Sista, Ulfatun Wahidatun Nisa
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the quality of cognitive test instruments in the science Islamization program at Darussalam Gontor University. This type of research is descriptive quantitative with a classical test theory analysis approach that tests the level of difficulty, discriminating power and deceptive power of each question. The sample was 50 students who randomly participated in the science Islamization program. Researchers use the ITEMAN application to analyze question items. The analysis showed that of the ten questions tested, there was 1 question that was coded to be eliminated, 1 question passed without revision, and eight suggested revising some multiple-choice answer items. The alpha conbrach score shows a score of 0.5, which means it is less reliable.

Educan Jurnal Pendidikan IslamVol. 8(2)
University of Darussalam Gontor (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Education and Islamic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.