Kairos and Telos in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Candidates’ Debate: Timing and Purpose

This research aimed to analyze the rhetorical strategies used in the 2024 U.S. presidential candidates’ debates between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, with a particular focus on kairos and telos as types of rhetorical strategies. Additionally, the study calculated the most dominant types of rhetorical strategies employed by each candidate to justify their ideas and persuade voters about their electoral campaigns. The research subjects were the debates between the two candidates, focusing on their use of kairos (timing, social norms, and opportunity) and telos (purpose) as rhetorical devices. Donald Trump consisted timing (18), social norm (12), and opportunity (6), while Kalama Harris consisted timing (9), social norm (7), and opportunity (7). The results showed that both candidates used these rhetorical devices to deliver their ideas effectively at the right moment and with a clear purpose, enhancing their ability to persuade voters and increase their chances of winning the election.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JELITA
Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56185/jelita.v6i1.867
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kairos and Telos in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Candidates’ Debate: Timing and Purpose

Jubilezer Sihite, Rony Arahta Sembiring, Rizky Munte
JELITA
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

Kairos and Telos in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Candidates’ Debate: Timing and Purpose

Jubilezer Sihite, Rony Arahta Sembiring, Rizky Munte
article en

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze the rhetorical strategies used in the 2024 U.S. presidential candidates’ debates between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, with a particular focus on kairos and telos as types of rhetorical strategies. Additionally, the study calculated the most dominant types of rhetorical strategies employed by each candidate to justify their ideas and persuade voters about their electoral campaigns. The research subjects were the debates between the two candidates, focusing on their use of kairos (timing, social norms, and opportunity) and telos (purpose) as rhetorical devices. Donald Trump consisted timing (18), social norm (12), and opportunity (6), while Kalama Harris consisted timing (9), social norm (7), and opportunity (7). The results showed that both candidates used these rhetorical devices to deliver their ideas effectively at the right moment and with a clear purpose, enhancing their ability to persuade voters and increase their chances of winning the election.

JELITAVol. 6(1)
University of HKBP Nommensen (ID)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.