Fertilizer demand and profitability amid global fuel-food-fertilizer crisis: Evidence from Ethiopia

• We assess fertilizer demand and profitability amid fuel–food–fertilizer price crisis. • Smallholder farmers are more responsive to fertilizer prices than to output prices. • Share of farmers with profitable AVCRs declined following the fertilizer price surges. We assess fertilizer demand and profitability in Ethiopia in the face of the recent global fuel–food–fertilizer price crisis and other domestic shocks. We first examine farmers’ response to changes in both fertilizer and food prices by estimating price elasticity of demand. We then evaluate the profitability of fertilizer by computing average value–cost ratios (AVCRs) associated with fertilizer application before and after these crises. We use detailed longitudinal household survey data collected in three rounds, covering both pre-crisis (2016 and 2019) and post-crisis (2023) production periods, focusing on three main staple crops in Ethiopia (maize, teff, and wheat). Our analysis shows that fertilizer adoption, and yield levels were increasing until the recent crises, but these trends have been halted by these crises. We also find slightly larger fertilizer price elasticity of demand estimates than previous estimates, ranging between −0.40 and −1.12, which vary across crops. We find that farmers are more responsive to fertilizer prices than to output prices. Farmers’ response to increases in staple prices was statistically insignificant and hence not as strong as theoretically perceived. Households with smaller farm sizes are relatively more responsive to changes in fertilizer prices. Finally, we show important dynamics in the profitability of chemical fertilizer. While the AVCRs show profitable trends for most crops, the share of farmers with profitable AVCRs declined following the fertilizer price surges. Our findings offer important insights for policy focusing on mitigating the adverse effects of fertilizer price shocks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Policy
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102785
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fertilizer demand and profitability amid global fuel-food-fertilizer crisis: Evidence from Ethiopia

Gashaw Tadesse Abate, Kibrom A. Abay, Guush Berhane, Tesfamichael Assefa
10 citations
Food Policy
Energy and Environment Impacts
1.33
article

Fertilizer demand and profitability amid global fuel-food-fertilizer crisis: Evidence from Ethiopia

Gashaw Tadesse Abate, Kibrom A. Abay, Guush Berhane, Tesfamichael Assefa
article en
10 citations

Abstract

• We assess fertilizer demand and profitability amid fuel–food–fertilizer price crisis. • Smallholder farmers are more responsive to fertilizer prices than to output prices. • Share of farmers with profitable AVCRs declined following the fertilizer price surges. We assess fertilizer demand and profitability in Ethiopia in the face of the recent global fuel–food–fertilizer price crisis and other domestic shocks. We first examine farmers’ response to changes in both fertilizer and food prices by estimating price elasticity of demand. We then evaluate the profitability of fertilizer by computing average value–cost ratios (AVCRs) associated with fertilizer application before and after these crises. We use detailed longitudinal household survey data collected in three rounds, covering both pre-crisis (2016 and 2019) and post-crisis (2023) production periods, focusing on three main staple crops in Ethiopia (maize, teff, and wheat). Our analysis shows that fertilizer adoption, and yield levels were increasing until the recent crises, but these trends have been halted by these crises. We also find slightly larger fertilizer price elasticity of demand estimates than previous estimates, ranging between −0.40 and −1.12, which vary across crops. We find that farmers are more responsive to fertilizer prices than to output prices. Farmers’ response to increases in staple prices was statistically insignificant and hence not as strong as theoretically perceived. Households with smaller farm sizes are relatively more responsive to changes in fertilizer prices. Finally, we show important dynamics in the profitability of chemical fertilizer. While the AVCRs show profitable trends for most crops, the share of farmers with profitable AVCRs declined following the fertilizer price surges. Our findings offer important insights for policy focusing on mitigating the adverse effects of fertilizer price shocks.

Food PolicyVol. 133
International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
United States Agency for International Development, Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Energy and Environment Impacts
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.