Thinking with ideas from affect theory: imagining otherwise in our literacy classrooms

Purpose The purpose of this conceptual paper is to challenge the introduction and implementation of policy mandates that threaten to reduce democratic, creative and responsive literacy pedagogies and practices in the early years. It draws on affect theory as a means to expand theorisations of literacy teaching and learning with approaches that privilege children’s knowledge as being central to the meaning making process. Design/methodology/approach Thinking with ideas from the conceptual paradigm of affect theory, I consider ways in which teachers can expand their repertoire of theories and literacy pedagogies in order to understand the diverse needs of children in contemporary classrooms. Findings Emphasising the importance of expanding how we imagine our daily pedagogies I thread reflective prompts throughout the discussion to engage the reader to consider how ideas might live in daily literacy classroom practice. Originality/value This paper shares insights from contemporary research in affect theory to disrupt the hegemony of early literacy practices. It speaks back to the dominance of reductive models of program approaches and expands views of what counts in early literacy teaching. It considers how we can become more closely attuned to the affective relations in classroom life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research Journal
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-09-2024-0209
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thinking with ideas from affect theory: imagining otherwise in our literacy classrooms

Jenny Sesta
Qualitative Research Journal
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

Thinking with ideas from affect theory: imagining otherwise in our literacy classrooms

Jenny Sesta
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this conceptual paper is to challenge the introduction and implementation of policy mandates that threaten to reduce democratic, creative and responsive literacy pedagogies and practices in the early years. It draws on affect theory as a means to expand theorisations of literacy teaching and learning with approaches that privilege children’s knowledge as being central to the meaning making process. Design/methodology/approach Thinking with ideas from the conceptual paradigm of affect theory, I consider ways in which teachers can expand their repertoire of theories and literacy pedagogies in order to understand the diverse needs of children in contemporary classrooms. Findings Emphasising the importance of expanding how we imagine our daily pedagogies I thread reflective prompts throughout the discussion to engage the reader to consider how ideas might live in daily literacy classroom practice. Originality/value This paper shares insights from contemporary research in affect theory to disrupt the hegemony of early literacy practices. It speaks back to the dominance of reductive models of program approaches and expands views of what counts in early literacy teaching. It considers how we can become more closely attuned to the affective relations in classroom life.

Qualitative Research JournalVol. 25(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (AU), Victoria University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Thinking with ideas from affect theory: imagining otherwise in our literacy classrooms — Jenny Sesta · Qualitative Research Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS