Study on the comparative performances of the solar stills with two different condensing glass cover shapes

• The experimental investigation is conducted on a solar still with an arc-formed glass cover. • The yield of the solar still is improved by 11.9 % and 12.2 %, respectively, at 20 mm and 25 mm water heights. • An improvement of 4.5 % and 4.6 % in energy efficiency is attained at 20 mm and 25 mm water heights. • The higher productivity is obtained with the solar stills at lower water masses. In the current scenario, the desalination of brackish water using an inactive solar still has been considered as a feasible, cost-effective solution to face the challenge of scarcity in freshwater. However, the insufficient productivity of such solar stills is hindering the practical, large-scale application of such stills. In this study, a solution for improving the productivity of a conventional solar still (CPSS) is analysed by modifying the design of the condensing glass. Two stills, one conventional (CPSS) and the other with arc-shaped condensing glass (AFSS), were investigated, and the results were compared. Further, the effect of water height on the performance of the solar stills is assessed. The results demonstrated that the modification of condensing cover augmented the productivity of the still by 11.9 % and 12.2 %, respectively, at 20 mm and 25 mm water heights. The daily efficacy of the CPSS and AFSS were recorded as 40 % and 44.5 % with 20 mm water heights. In addition, the stills with 20 mm water heights showcased better performance compared to the same stills with 25 mm water heights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar Compass
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solcom.2024.100103
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the comparative performances of the solar stills with two different condensing glass cover shapes

P. Manoj Kumar
2 citations
Solar Compass
Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
0.20
article

Study on the comparative performances of the solar stills with two different condensing glass cover shapes

P. Manoj Kumar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• The experimental investigation is conducted on a solar still with an arc-formed glass cover. • The yield of the solar still is improved by 11.9 % and 12.2 %, respectively, at 20 mm and 25 mm water heights. • An improvement of 4.5 % and 4.6 % in energy efficiency is attained at 20 mm and 25 mm water heights. • The higher productivity is obtained with the solar stills at lower water masses. In the current scenario, the desalination of brackish water using an inactive solar still has been considered as a feasible, cost-effective solution to face the challenge of scarcity in freshwater. However, the insufficient productivity of such solar stills is hindering the practical, large-scale application of such stills. In this study, a solution for improving the productivity of a conventional solar still (CPSS) is analysed by modifying the design of the condensing glass. Two stills, one conventional (CPSS) and the other with arc-shaped condensing glass (AFSS), were investigated, and the results were compared. Further, the effect of water height on the performance of the solar stills is assessed. The results demonstrated that the modification of condensing cover augmented the productivity of the still by 11.9 % and 12.2 %, respectively, at 20 mm and 25 mm water heights. The daily efficacy of the CPSS and AFSS were recorded as 40 % and 44.5 % with 20 mm water heights. In addition, the stills with 20 mm water heights showcased better performance compared to the same stills with 25 mm water heights.

Solar CompassVol. 13
KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology (IN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.