Cutting Parameter Optimization of Single Point Cutting Tool of CNC Lathe Machine Using Machine Learning Algorithm

In this study, two machine learning models, Random Forest Regressor (RFR) and Decision Tree Regressor (DTR), were applied to predict surface roughness (SR) in machining processes (turning) based on key input parameters: spindle speed (SS), feed rate (FR), and depth of cut (DOC). The performance of both models was evaluated using R² (R-squared), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The Decision Tree Regressor achieved near-perfect accuracy with an R² score of 0.9999 and minimal error metrics. The Random Forest Regressor also performed exceptionally well, with an R² of 0.9988 and similarly low error values. Visual analyses, including residual and radar plots, confirmed the high accuracy of both models, with the Decision Tree Regressor slightly outperforming the Random Forest model. However, the Random Forest Regressor's ensemble structure provides better generalization and robustness, making it a more reliable model for larger or more complex datasets. This study concludes that both models are highly effective for predicting surface roughness, but the choice between them should depend on the specific trade-offs between accuracy and generalization needed in a given application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nanotechnology Perceptions
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62441/nano-ntp.vi.3755
Primary Topic
Advanced machining processes and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cutting Parameter Optimization of Single Point Cutting Tool of CNC Lathe Machine Using Machine Learning Algorithm

Vishal S. Sharma, Sunil Kumar Patidar
Nanotechnology Perceptions
Advanced machining processes and optimization
article

Cutting Parameter Optimization of Single Point Cutting Tool of CNC Lathe Machine Using Machine Learning Algorithm

Vishal S. Sharma, Sunil Kumar Patidar
article en

Abstract

In this study, two machine learning models, Random Forest Regressor (RFR) and Decision Tree Regressor (DTR), were applied to predict surface roughness (SR) in machining processes (turning) based on key input parameters: spindle speed (SS), feed rate (FR), and depth of cut (DOC). The performance of both models was evaluated using R² (R-squared), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The Decision Tree Regressor achieved near-perfect accuracy with an R² score of 0.9999 and minimal error metrics. The Random Forest Regressor also performed exceptionally well, with an R² of 0.9988 and similarly low error values. Visual analyses, including residual and radar plots, confirmed the high accuracy of both models, with the Decision Tree Regressor slightly outperforming the Random Forest model. However, the Random Forest Regressor's ensemble structure provides better generalization and robustness, making it a more reliable model for larger or more complex datasets. This study concludes that both models are highly effective for predicting surface roughness, but the choice between them should depend on the specific trade-offs between accuracy and generalization needed in a given application.

Nanotechnology Perceptions
Medi-Caps University (IN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Advanced machining processes and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cutting Parameter Optimization of Single Point Cutting Tool of CNC Lathe Machine Using Machine Learning Algorithm — Vishal S. Sharma, Sunil Kumar Patidar · Nanotechnology Perceptions (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS