The Factors of Contributing to Adademic Misconduct of Engineering Students Survey: Preliminary Results

Academic misconduct is a serious problem in engineering higher education as it undermines student learning as well as the credibly of higher education institutions. The Factors contributing to Academic Misconduct of Engineering Students (FAMES) is a student survey developed to examine students’ perceptions on academic misconduct behaviour and to identify factors that predict self-reported cheating on proctored and unproctored assessments. The survey has been distributed at two Canadian universities. Preliminary results indicate that while students indicate they perceive some academic violations as inappropriate, other behaviours are not reported to be problematic. Students’ attitudes toward misconduct also depends on the assessment type. In addition, the less serious students consider an attitude, the more frequent they reported to engage in that behaviour. As has been reported elsewhere, students perceive academic misconduct among their peers happens at a much higher rate than what is indicated by aggregate self-reports. Future data analysis will include examining which factors related to the Fraud Triangle theory influence students’ decisions to engage in academic misconduct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18513
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Factors of Contributing to Adademic Misconduct of Engineering Students Survey: Preliminary Results

Saad Chahine, Sean Maw, Brian Frank, Kimia Moozeh et al.
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

The Factors of Contributing to Adademic Misconduct of Engineering Students Survey: Preliminary Results

Saad Chahine, Sean Maw, Brian Frank, Kimia Moozeh, Lydia Scholle-Cotton
article en

Abstract

Academic misconduct is a serious problem in engineering higher education as it undermines student learning as well as the credibly of higher education institutions. The Factors contributing to Academic Misconduct of Engineering Students (FAMES) is a student survey developed to examine students’ perceptions on academic misconduct behaviour and to identify factors that predict self-reported cheating on proctored and unproctored assessments. The survey has been distributed at two Canadian universities. Preliminary results indicate that while students indicate they perceive some academic violations as inappropriate, other behaviours are not reported to be problematic. Students’ attitudes toward misconduct also depends on the assessment type. In addition, the less serious students consider an attitude, the more frequent they reported to engage in that behaviour. As has been reported elsewhere, students perceive academic misconduct among their peers happens at a much higher rate than what is indicated by aggregate self-reports. Future data analysis will include examining which factors related to the Fraud Triangle theory influence students’ decisions to engage in academic misconduct.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Queen's University (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.