How we teach design: A comparison of Canadian and American courses.

Chemical engineering design is a requirement for accreditation under the Washington Accord. Within that requirement there is variation in how chemical engineering design is taught and what is covered in programs in Canada and the United States. Chemical engineering design is somewhat unique with respect to engineering design in other disciplines as chemical engineering design is often taught at a system design level and focused on transforming raw materials into products (including energy products) and treating and/or recycling the waste materials [1]. Chemical engineering design encompasses the design of subsystems and components that are required for the plant or process design and the integration of subsystems into larger plant and/or societal systems [1,2] and in the context of a circular economy [2]. Due to this systemic and integrative perspective, chemical engineering design is uniquely positioned to support the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)[2,3,4]. In 2022, the AIChE Education Division Curriculum Survey Committee conducted the capstone design course survey and received responses from ten Canadian universities and sixty-seven American universities and reported results [5]. In this paper, we compare American and Canadian programs based on the survey results and examine the similarities and differences based on geographic location and accrediting body among these programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18529
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How we teach design: A comparison of Canadian and American courses.

Laura Ford, Marnie Jamieson
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Design Education and Practice
article

How we teach design: A comparison of Canadian and American courses.

Laura Ford, Marnie Jamieson
article en

Abstract

Chemical engineering design is a requirement for accreditation under the Washington Accord. Within that requirement there is variation in how chemical engineering design is taught and what is covered in programs in Canada and the United States. Chemical engineering design is somewhat unique with respect to engineering design in other disciplines as chemical engineering design is often taught at a system design level and focused on transforming raw materials into products (including energy products) and treating and/or recycling the waste materials [1]. Chemical engineering design encompasses the design of subsystems and components that are required for the plant or process design and the integration of subsystems into larger plant and/or societal systems [1,2] and in the context of a circular economy [2]. Due to this systemic and integrative perspective, chemical engineering design is uniquely positioned to support the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)[2,3,4]. In 2022, the AIChE Education Division Curriculum Survey Committee conducted the capstone design course survey and received responses from ten Canadian universities and sixty-seven American universities and reported results [5]. In this paper, we compare American and Canadian programs based on the survey results and examine the similarities and differences based on geographic location and accrediting body among these programs.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
University of Alberta (CA), University of Tulsa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How we teach design: A comparison of Canadian and American courses. — Laura Ford, Marnie Jamieson · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS