Faculty Reflections and Adaptations in a First-Year Block Model

The paper highlights the experiences of faculty members in the transition to a block model in engineering education, where courses are taught sequentially in short blocks, blending in-person and online instruction. The block model pilot at a suburban Toronto campus aimed to improve student outcomes, alleviate student stress from heavy workloads and commuting. Kolb’s cycle of experiential education was used as a framework for understanding faculty experiences. Faculty members adapted their teaching methods for condensed learning sessions, supported by development workshops and ongoing pedagogical counseling. Faculty members identified challenges and successes in redesigning courses, emphasizing the importance of faculty development and student-centered programming. It contributes to the scholarship of teaching and learning by documenting the faculty perspective on block model implementation, informing best practices for engineering educators. The findings highlight the potential of the block model to foster active learning communities and suggest areas for future refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18606
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Faculty Reflections and Adaptations in a First-Year Block Model

Jeffrey Harris, Kai Zhuang, M. C. George, Andrew Skelton et al.
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Faculty Reflections and Adaptations in a First-Year Block Model

Jeffrey Harris, Kai Zhuang, M. C. George, Andrew Skelton, Patrick Molicard-Chartier
article en

Abstract

The paper highlights the experiences of faculty members in the transition to a block model in engineering education, where courses are taught sequentially in short blocks, blending in-person and online instruction. The block model pilot at a suburban Toronto campus aimed to improve student outcomes, alleviate student stress from heavy workloads and commuting. Kolb’s cycle of experiential education was used as a framework for understanding faculty experiences. Faculty members adapted their teaching methods for condensed learning sessions, supported by development workshops and ongoing pedagogical counseling. Faculty members identified challenges and successes in redesigning courses, emphasizing the importance of faculty development and student-centered programming. It contributes to the scholarship of teaching and learning by documenting the faculty perspective on block model implementation, informing best practices for engineering educators. The findings highlight the potential of the block model to foster active learning communities and suggest areas for future refinement.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
York University (CA)
York University
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Faculty Reflections and Adaptations in a First-Year Block Model — Jeffrey Harris, Kai Zhuang, et al. · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS