Longitudinal changes in teaming dimensions from self- and peer-feedback in early year design courses

The ability to work effectively in a team environment is critical to engineering practice, and a required accreditation element of engineering programs in Canada. Developing this ability often involves repeated cycles of team activity, peer feedback, and self-reflection. This work describes an exploratory study of longitudinal changes in student self- and peer-evaluated teaming dimensions on engineering teams as students progress through a sequence of design and professional practice courses. The data shows a positive trend in self- and peer-evaluated teaming, and most encouragingly a more significant improvement among students with initially low scores on their first teaming evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18588
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal changes in teaming dimensions from self- and peer-feedback in early year design courses

Brian W. Frank, Matthew J. W. McLarnon, Jose A. Espinoza, Tom O’Neill
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Longitudinal changes in teaming dimensions from self- and peer-feedback in early year design courses

Brian W. Frank, Matthew J. W. McLarnon, Jose A. Espinoza, Tom O’Neill
article en

Abstract

The ability to work effectively in a team environment is critical to engineering practice, and a required accreditation element of engineering programs in Canada. Developing this ability often involves repeated cycles of team activity, peer feedback, and self-reflection. This work describes an exploratory study of longitudinal changes in student self- and peer-evaluated teaming dimensions on engineering teams as students progress through a sequence of design and professional practice courses. The data shows a positive trend in self- and peer-evaluated teaming, and most encouragingly a more significant improvement among students with initially low scores on their first teaming evaluation.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
University of Calgary (CA), Queen's University (CA), Mount Royal University (CA), The University of Winnipeg (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.