Longitudinal changes in teaming dimensions from self- and peer-feedback in early year design courses
The ability to work effectively in a team environment is critical to engineering practice, and a required accreditation element of engineering programs in Canada. Developing this ability often involves repeated cycles of team activity, peer feedback, and self-reflection. This work describes an exploratory study of longitudinal changes in student self- and peer-evaluated teaming dimensions on engineering teams as students progress through a sequence of design and professional practice courses. The data shows a positive trend in self- and peer-evaluated teaming, and most encouragingly a more significant improvement among students with initially low scores on their first teaming evaluation.
Authors
- Brian W. Frank
- Matthew J. W. McLarnon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8933-3538)
- Jose A. Espinoza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-6830)
- Tom O’Neill (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8336-5763)
Institutions
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Queen's University (CA)
- Mount Royal University (CA)
- The University of Winnipeg (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
- Published
- 2024-12-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18588
- Primary Topic
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00