Fear and Loathing in Attribute Grading: Helping Students Gain Confidence and Learn Effectively

Motivated by the need for more effective grading methodologies in university settings, this paper investigates students’ perception of and responses to Attribute Grading (AG). Focusing on a first-year undergraduate remedial calculus class for engineering students, we research and analyze the effect of this standards-based grading scheme on extrinsic motivation and learning practices, in attempts to discern whether the theoretical advantages of it manifest in reality. Findings suggest that students effectively leverage the uniquely nuanced feedback provided by AG to inform their learning strategies. Given the nature of this field of inquiry, we propose avenues for future research to further explore these issues and enhance understanding of effective grading practices in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18591
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fear and Loathing in Attribute Grading: Helping Students Gain Confidence and Learn Effectively

S. Cochran, Shai Cohen
1 citations
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
1.46
article

Fear and Loathing in Attribute Grading: Helping Students Gain Confidence and Learn Effectively

S. Cochran, Shai Cohen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Motivated by the need for more effective grading methodologies in university settings, this paper investigates students’ perception of and responses to Attribute Grading (AG). Focusing on a first-year undergraduate remedial calculus class for engineering students, we research and analyze the effect of this standards-based grading scheme on extrinsic motivation and learning practices, in attempts to discern whether the theoretical advantages of it manifest in reality. Findings suggest that students effectively leverage the uniquely nuanced feedback provided by AG to inform their learning strategies. Given the nature of this field of inquiry, we propose avenues for future research to further explore these issues and enhance understanding of effective grading practices in higher education.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
University of Toronto (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fear and Loathing in Attribute Grading: Helping Students Gain Confidence and Learn Effectively — S. Cochran, Shai Cohen · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS