Ontario Engineering Technology to Engineering Transfer Pathway Design Update

There are very few opportunities for students to transfer into accredited engineering programs in Ontario. Transfer pathways have different entry requirements compared to high school direct-entry options, they credit previous learning, and can be designed to deliver bridging courses that reduce time to completion in the degree program. These factors, along with other thoughtful design decisions, reduce barriers for students, including underrepresented students, and increase the diversity of the degree programs. Queen’s University has piloted a the three-phase engineering transfer framework with wraparound supports and is growing the pathway to include more engineering disciplines, sending institutions, and receiving institutions. An outcome of this project is the development and sharing examples of key accreditation documentation, institutional processes, and best practices for supporting transfer students. These can be used by other institutions who are interested in implementing transfer pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18638
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ontario Engineering Technology to Engineering Transfer Pathway Design Update

Brian Frank, Kimia Moozeh, Max Ullrich
1 citations
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
1.18
article

Ontario Engineering Technology to Engineering Transfer Pathway Design Update

Brian Frank, Kimia Moozeh, Max Ullrich
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There are very few opportunities for students to transfer into accredited engineering programs in Ontario. Transfer pathways have different entry requirements compared to high school direct-entry options, they credit previous learning, and can be designed to deliver bridging courses that reduce time to completion in the degree program. These factors, along with other thoughtful design decisions, reduce barriers for students, including underrepresented students, and increase the diversity of the degree programs. Queen’s University has piloted a the three-phase engineering transfer framework with wraparound supports and is growing the pathway to include more engineering disciplines, sending institutions, and receiving institutions. An outcome of this project is the development and sharing examples of key accreditation documentation, institutional processes, and best practices for supporting transfer students. These can be used by other institutions who are interested in implementing transfer pathways.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Queen's University (CA)
University of Windsor, York University, University of Toronto
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
1.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ontario Engineering Technology to Engineering Transfer Pathway Design Update — Brian Frank, Kimia Moozeh, et al. · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS