Enhancing Learning via AI-Generated Feedback and Resubmission of Formative Assessments

Large Language Models (LLMs) are equipped with strong natural language understanding abilities. These abilities can be leveraged to evaluate and provide feedback on student work, provided that the model is properly prompted. We find that this feedback is more detailed, personalized, and requires fewer resources to produce than human-generated feedback. Due to the reduction in resources, students were permitted to resubmit their formative assessments throughout a course. Results show that students who consistently resubmitted performed statistically significantly better on their summative assessments, despite having indistinguishable patterns of access to course materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18540
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Learning via AI-Generated Feedback and Resubmission of Formative Assessments

Michael Cooper-Stachowsky, Melinda Cooper-Stachowsky
2 citations
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
0.30
article

Enhancing Learning via AI-Generated Feedback and Resubmission of Formative Assessments

Michael Cooper-Stachowsky, Melinda Cooper-Stachowsky
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are equipped with strong natural language understanding abilities. These abilities can be leveraged to evaluate and provide feedback on student work, provided that the model is properly prompted. We find that this feedback is more detailed, personalized, and requires fewer resources to produce than human-generated feedback. Due to the reduction in resources, students were permitted to resubmit their formative assessments throughout a course. Results show that students who consistently resubmitted performed statistically significantly better on their summative assessments, despite having indistinguishable patterns of access to course materials.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Guelph-Humber (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
0.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing Learning via AI-Generated Feedback and Resubmission of Formative Assessments — Michael Cooper-Stachowsky, Melinda Cooper-Stachowsky · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS