Relationships between grades and gender in student program preferences in engineering

Engineering programs overall have underrepresentation of women, but variations exist between programs. We were interested in how grades influence students’ decisions related to program selection and if there were differences by gender. Using data from one large institution, we examine whether women students placed in their top-choice program tend to have higher averages than men, whether women are more successful at getting into their top-choice program, and if there is a relationship between gender, first-year grades, and program ranking patterns, which could impact gender imbalances between engineering disciplines. We found that women had higher rates of acceptance to first-choice programs and differences in patterns of program preference, with high-average men almost exclusively choosing competitive programs while high-average women choose a range of programs. Our findings suggest student decision-making for competitive program placement differs by gender and may be influenced by grades, both for an individual’s and historical program information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18576
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships between grades and gender in student program preferences in engineering

Emily E. Adam, Agnes D’Entremont, Peter Ostafichuk, Negar M. Harandi
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
article

Relationships between grades and gender in student program preferences in engineering

Emily E. Adam, Agnes D’Entremont, Peter Ostafichuk, Negar M. Harandi
article en

Abstract

Engineering programs overall have underrepresentation of women, but variations exist between programs. We were interested in how grades influence students’ decisions related to program selection and if there were differences by gender. Using data from one large institution, we examine whether women students placed in their top-choice program tend to have higher averages than men, whether women are more successful at getting into their top-choice program, and if there is a relationship between gender, first-year grades, and program ranking patterns, which could impact gender imbalances between engineering disciplines. We found that women had higher rates of acceptance to first-choice programs and differences in patterns of program preference, with high-average men almost exclusively choosing competitive programs while high-average women choose a range of programs. Our findings suggest student decision-making for competitive program placement differs by gender and may be influenced by grades, both for an individual’s and historical program information.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relationships between grades and gender in student program preferences in engineering — Emily E. Adam, Agnes D’Entremont, et al. · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS