Towards a comprehensive framework for digital inclusion: a comparison of international measurements

Purpose Measuring the extent of digital inclusion is a complex task. This study aims to monitor existing digital inclusion indices at the national level, compare their consistencies and differences and based on this, develop a more comprehensive measurement framework. Design/methodology/approach The study selected the existing digital inclusion indices that met the screening criteria through a literature survey. Eight digital inclusion indices were included in the final selection and their measurement methodologies were collected. Thereafter, the study adopted a content analysis method to examine and compare the methodologies of the selected digital inclusion indices, with the coding framework grounded on the literature review. Findings Results suggest that five dimensions of digital inclusion – Access, Skills, Usage, Acceptance and Impact – were measured. Access is the first priority dimension that all digital inclusion indices pay attention to. Skills and Usage are under-measured by methodological limitations in practical measurement tools. Acceptance and Impact are the least covered dimensions both in academic research and practical measurement. Based on this, we propose three suggestions for developing a more comprehensive global framework: designing from the national lens, using more objective and original data sources and improving the framework and indicators with theory. Originality/value The study provides scholars and policymakers in the field of digital inclusion with a reference point to create a more comprehensive measurement framework for digital inclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-06-2024-0494
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a comprehensive framework for digital inclusion: a comparison of international measurements

Siyue Jia, Jia Tina Du, Yan Hui
2 citations
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Social Media and Politics
1.91
article

Towards a comprehensive framework for digital inclusion: a comparison of international measurements

Siyue Jia, Jia Tina Du, Yan Hui
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose Measuring the extent of digital inclusion is a complex task. This study aims to monitor existing digital inclusion indices at the national level, compare their consistencies and differences and based on this, develop a more comprehensive measurement framework. Design/methodology/approach The study selected the existing digital inclusion indices that met the screening criteria through a literature survey. Eight digital inclusion indices were included in the final selection and their measurement methodologies were collected. Thereafter, the study adopted a content analysis method to examine and compare the methodologies of the selected digital inclusion indices, with the coding framework grounded on the literature review. Findings Results suggest that five dimensions of digital inclusion – Access, Skills, Usage, Acceptance and Impact – were measured. Access is the first priority dimension that all digital inclusion indices pay attention to. Skills and Usage are under-measured by methodological limitations in practical measurement tools. Acceptance and Impact are the least covered dimensions both in academic research and practical measurement. Based on this, we propose three suggestions for developing a more comprehensive global framework: designing from the national lens, using more objective and original data sources and improving the framework and indicators with theory. Originality/value The study provides scholars and policymakers in the field of digital inclusion with a reference point to create a more comprehensive measurement framework for digital inclusion.

Aslib Journal of Information Management
Charles Sturt University (AU), University of South Australia (AU), Renmin University of China (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Social Media and Politics
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards a comprehensive framework for digital inclusion: a comparison of international measurements — Siyue Jia, Jia Tina Du, et al. · Aslib Journal of Information Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS