Competency mapping for equity, diversity, inclusion, and indigeneity in engineering undergraduate curricula

Educating students on equity, diversity, inclusion, and Indigeneity (EDI.I) in engineering education is motivated by both accreditation and Indigenous reconciliation. We aimed to evaluate EDI.I content comprehensiveness in our undergraduate curricula by applying a previously developed competency framework and method. We identified courses with EDI.I content across five programs, interviewed 14 instructors, and collected teaching materials. We mapped content to a competency framework with three mastery levels and categories of: Individual Relationship to EDI.I; Interpersonal Impact of EDI.I; EDI.I at an Organizational Level; and EDI.I in Society. Largest coverage gaps were at the highest mastery level and mid-program. Underlying messages often focused on individual rather than structural approaches. Most course content was either standalone or well-integrated with technical content. Our method identified gaps in EDI.I coverage, working well for standalone content. Results will inform future EDI.I curricular coverage at our institution, and the method allows progress assessment in EDI.I coverage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18560
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competency mapping for equity, diversity, inclusion, and indigeneity in engineering undergraduate curricula

Agnes D’Entremont, Jessica Wolf
1 citations
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Higher Education and Employability
1.46
article

Competency mapping for equity, diversity, inclusion, and indigeneity in engineering undergraduate curricula

Agnes D’Entremont, Jessica Wolf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Educating students on equity, diversity, inclusion, and Indigeneity (EDI.I) in engineering education is motivated by both accreditation and Indigenous reconciliation. We aimed to evaluate EDI.I content comprehensiveness in our undergraduate curricula by applying a previously developed competency framework and method. We identified courses with EDI.I content across five programs, interviewed 14 instructors, and collected teaching materials. We mapped content to a competency framework with three mastery levels and categories of: Individual Relationship to EDI.I; Interpersonal Impact of EDI.I; EDI.I at an Organizational Level; and EDI.I in Society. Largest coverage gaps were at the highest mastery level and mid-program. Underlying messages often focused on individual rather than structural approaches. Most course content was either standalone or well-integrated with technical content. Our method identified gaps in EDI.I coverage, working well for standalone content. Results will inform future EDI.I curricular coverage at our institution, and the method allows progress assessment in EDI.I coverage.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Higher Education and Employability
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Competency mapping for equity, diversity, inclusion, and indigeneity in engineering undergraduate curricula — Agnes D’Entremont, Jessica Wolf · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS