The ‘urgencies’ of implementing an RRI approach in EU-funded law enforcement technology development: between frameworks and practice

RRI aspirations are complicated by two kinds of ‘urgency' in the field of EU-funded security research: the timeframe and requirements for such technologies often present researchers with ‘urgency' due to the sensitive nature of the security domain and it is ‘urgent' for building societal trust in security technology that RRI approaches shall be introduced and effectively implemented in the lifecycle of developing such technologies. Drawing on experience from an H2020-multidisciplinary project, this article presents the gap between the top-down formal frameworks and bottom-up practice of designing and implementing RRI approaches under conditions of ‘urgency’ and time pressure. In the case of EU-funded security research, it is argued, there are still significant practical challenges which hinder the effective implementation of RRI approaches, potentially limiting the extent to which such approaches deliver meaningful impact. The paper reflects on these challenges, as well as on potential strategies to overcome them in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2390198
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ‘urgencies’ of implementing an RRI approach in EU-funded law enforcement technology development: between frameworks and practice

Stergios Aidinlis
1 citations
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
2.23
article

The ‘urgencies’ of implementing an RRI approach in EU-funded law enforcement technology development: between frameworks and practice

Stergios Aidinlis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

RRI aspirations are complicated by two kinds of ‘urgency' in the field of EU-funded security research: the timeframe and requirements for such technologies often present researchers with ‘urgency' due to the sensitive nature of the security domain and it is ‘urgent' for building societal trust in security technology that RRI approaches shall be introduced and effectively implemented in the lifecycle of developing such technologies. Drawing on experience from an H2020-multidisciplinary project, this article presents the gap between the top-down formal frameworks and bottom-up practice of designing and implementing RRI approaches under conditions of ‘urgency’ and time pressure. In the case of EU-funded security research, it is argued, there are still significant practical challenges which hinder the effective implementation of RRI approaches, potentially limiting the extent to which such approaches deliver meaningful impact. The paper reflects on these challenges, as well as on potential strategies to overcome them in the future.

Journal of Responsible InnovationVol. 12(1)
Durham University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.