Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah

This study explored the typologies of Islamic thought among Muhammadiyah elites in East Java concerning the discourse on apostasy. Responses vary, with the inclusive view treating apostasy as a private matter between the individual and God, a basic human right with no legal consequences, supported by the Qur'an and the 1945 Constitution. The exclusive view, however, sees apostasy as a public offense, where freedom of choice is conditional and legal repercussions are necessary. The didactic perspective understands apostasy as a moral error, best addressed through education and compassionate guidance to encourage a return to Islam. The findings indicate a dominant trend towards inclusive views but reveal inconsistencies, as elites may express inclusive views on religious freedom while adopting exclusive stances on legal aspects of apostasy. Despite these differences, all maintain a didactic approach when dealing with apostasy within families. This study underscored the dynamic nature of Islamic thought in Muhammadiyah, challenging the perception of rigidity and highlighting the influence of diverse sociological and intellectual backgrounds.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Afkaruna Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v20i2.24555
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah

Warsidi Warsidi, Zuly Qodir, Nafik Muthohirin, Sholihul Huda
Afkaruna Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
article

Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah

Warsidi Warsidi, Zuly Qodir, Nafik Muthohirin, Sholihul Huda
article en

Abstract

This study explored the typologies of Islamic thought among Muhammadiyah elites in East Java concerning the discourse on apostasy. Responses vary, with the inclusive view treating apostasy as a private matter between the individual and God, a basic human right with no legal consequences, supported by the Qur'an and the 1945 Constitution. The exclusive view, however, sees apostasy as a public offense, where freedom of choice is conditional and legal repercussions are necessary. The didactic perspective understands apostasy as a moral error, best addressed through education and compassionate guidance to encourage a return to Islam. The findings indicate a dominant trend towards inclusive views but reveal inconsistencies, as elites may express inclusive views on religious freedom while adopting exclusive stances on legal aspects of apostasy. Despite these differences, all maintain a didactic approach when dealing with apostasy within families. This study underscored the dynamic nature of Islamic thought in Muhammadiyah, challenging the perception of rigidity and highlighting the influence of diverse sociological and intellectual backgrounds.

Afkaruna Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic StudiesVol. 20(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah — Warsidi Warsidi, Zuly Qodir, et al. · Afkaruna Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS