The Robust Asymmetric Minimum Cost Consensus Models with Interval-type Opinions

Existing consensus models primarily rely on precise opinions from decision-makers in a predefined context, neglecting the dynamics of expert opinion adjustments. To address this limitation, we introduce the interval-type opinions and explores the group decision consensus model under asymmetric adjustment cost from an uncertainty perspective. Then, the robust optimization theory is applied to adress the uncertainty in adjustment costs of decision-making individuals. The robust asymmetric cost consensus model of interval opinions under three uncertain scenarios is built. Finally, the validity of proposed model is verified by numerical calculations, and a sensitivity analysis and comparative study are performed. The results show that: (1) Utilizing interval opinions can significantly reduce consensus costs when compared to precise opinions; (2) Comprehensively comparing the three proposed robust models, the consensus model with budget asymmetric cost has the best performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Technology And Control
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.itc.53.4.37622
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Robust Asymmetric Minimum Cost Consensus Models with Interval-type Opinions

Zexing Dai, Zhiming Fang, Gang Zhu
1 citations
Information Technology And Control
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.49
article

The Robust Asymmetric Minimum Cost Consensus Models with Interval-type Opinions

Zexing Dai, Zhiming Fang, Gang Zhu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Existing consensus models primarily rely on precise opinions from decision-makers in a predefined context, neglecting the dynamics of expert opinion adjustments. To address this limitation, we introduce the interval-type opinions and explores the group decision consensus model under asymmetric adjustment cost from an uncertainty perspective. Then, the robust optimization theory is applied to adress the uncertainty in adjustment costs of decision-making individuals. The robust asymmetric cost consensus model of interval opinions under three uncertain scenarios is built. Finally, the validity of proposed model is verified by numerical calculations, and a sensitivity analysis and comparative study are performed. The results show that: (1) Utilizing interval opinions can significantly reduce consensus costs when compared to precise opinions; (2) Comprehensively comparing the three proposed robust models, the consensus model with budget asymmetric cost has the best performance.

Information Technology And ControlVol. 53(4)
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN), Chuzhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Robust Asymmetric Minimum Cost Consensus Models with Interval-type Opinions — Zexing Dai, Zhiming Fang, et al. · Information Technology And Control (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS