“Race,” Racism, and Race Norming in the National Football League Concussion Settlement

This article analyzes the administration of “race” and race norming in the National Football League (NFL) Concussion Settlement. It examines the use of the race-based algorithm, its consequences, and its unresolved future. I argue that despite the NFL’s pledge of “race neutral” tests, the race-norming scandal remains far from resolved. Modifications to previous protocols and provisions to develop new norms flag the NFL’s obsession with population-based adjustments. While the explicit utilization of “race” might currently be eliminated, other variables may still produce racialized scores and negatively affect compensation levels. I argue that the NFL’s persistent conviction that there is a biological or cultural basis of “race” propels them to compulsively pursue norming methods. However, until the concept of “race” is thoroughly abandoned and the faith in racial difference whether based in biology/genetics and/or cultural/social circumstances rejected outright, the settlement will continue to be plagued by unjust results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kinesiology Review
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2024-0062
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Race,” Racism, and Race Norming in the National Football League Concussion Settlement

Lucia Trimbur
1 citations
Kinesiology Review
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
1.11
article

“Race,” Racism, and Race Norming in the National Football League Concussion Settlement

Lucia Trimbur
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article analyzes the administration of “race” and race norming in the National Football League (NFL) Concussion Settlement. It examines the use of the race-based algorithm, its consequences, and its unresolved future. I argue that despite the NFL’s pledge of “race neutral” tests, the race-norming scandal remains far from resolved. Modifications to previous protocols and provisions to develop new norms flag the NFL’s obsession with population-based adjustments. While the explicit utilization of “race” might currently be eliminated, other variables may still produce racialized scores and negatively affect compensation levels. I argue that the NFL’s persistent conviction that there is a biological or cultural basis of “race” propels them to compulsively pursue norming methods. However, until the concept of “race” is thoroughly abandoned and the faith in racial difference whether based in biology/genetics and/or cultural/social circumstances rejected outright, the settlement will continue to be plagued by unjust results.

Kinesiology ReviewVol. 14(2)
City University of New York (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.