Impact of landscape patterns on river water quality: Spatial-scale effects across an agricultural-urban interface

• Optimal spatial scales for assessing water quality were evaluated for a mixed area. • Landscape patterns impact water quality more significantly in the rainy season. • Dynamic subwatershed exhibit the highest explanatory power for water quality. • Largest patch indices (LPI) for agriculture and waterbody are key factors. • Controlling LPI of agriculture < 10 % and LPI of waterbody > 1.5 % mitigates pollution. Urban river water pollution is a serious environmental challenge confronting urban areas worldwide. The scientific quantification of the impact of landscape patterns on water quality provides essential support for pollution control and watershed landscape optimization. In this study, we onducted an in-depth and meticulous exploration of the relationship between the landscape patterns and water quality in the Wen-Rui Tang River watershed at four distinct spatial scales (single subwatershed, dynamic subwatershed, riparian buffer, and reach buffer) and two time scales (dry season and rainy season). Regression models were used to investigate the quantitative impact of landscape patterns on water quality, redundancy analysis was employed to assess the overall explanatory power, and non-parametric point-of-change analysis was applied to evaluate variations in water quality along landscape gradients and identify critical landscape threshold ranges. The results indicate that the model performance of disolved oxygen at the reach buffer scale, pH and total nitrogen at the riparian buffer scale, and ammonia nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, and total phosphorus at the dynamic subwatershed scale were better than at other scales. Overall, the dynamic subwatershed scale showed the strongest explanatory power for water quality indicators, with 91.2 % for the rainy season and 83.2 % for the dry season. The largest patch index of agricultural land (A_LPI) and water bodies (W_LPI) were identified as the most critical landscape indices influencing water quality at the dynamic sub-watershed scale, with threshold values for these indices established as A_LPI < 10 % and W_LPI > 1.5 %. These findings offer a comprehensive understanding of the spatiotemporal impacts of landscape patterns on water quality and offer valuable insights for watershed management and ecological planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.113019
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of landscape patterns on river water quality: Spatial-scale effects across an agricultural-urban interface

Xiaoliang Ji, Randy A. Dahlgren, Yingying Wu, Kun Mei et al.
18 citations
Ecological Indicators
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
3.63
article

Impact of landscape patterns on river water quality: Spatial-scale effects across an agricultural-urban interface

Xiaoliang Ji, Randy A. Dahlgren, Yingying Wu, Kun Mei, Haonan Shi, Minmin Yang, Yueru Guan
article en
18 citations

Abstract

• Optimal spatial scales for assessing water quality were evaluated for a mixed area. • Landscape patterns impact water quality more significantly in the rainy season. • Dynamic subwatershed exhibit the highest explanatory power for water quality. • Largest patch indices (LPI) for agriculture and waterbody are key factors. • Controlling LPI of agriculture < 10 % and LPI of waterbody > 1.5 % mitigates pollution. Urban river water pollution is a serious environmental challenge confronting urban areas worldwide. The scientific quantification of the impact of landscape patterns on water quality provides essential support for pollution control and watershed landscape optimization. In this study, we onducted an in-depth and meticulous exploration of the relationship between the landscape patterns and water quality in the Wen-Rui Tang River watershed at four distinct spatial scales (single subwatershed, dynamic subwatershed, riparian buffer, and reach buffer) and two time scales (dry season and rainy season). Regression models were used to investigate the quantitative impact of landscape patterns on water quality, redundancy analysis was employed to assess the overall explanatory power, and non-parametric point-of-change analysis was applied to evaluate variations in water quality along landscape gradients and identify critical landscape threshold ranges. The results indicate that the model performance of disolved oxygen at the reach buffer scale, pH and total nitrogen at the riparian buffer scale, and ammonia nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, and total phosphorus at the dynamic subwatershed scale were better than at other scales. Overall, the dynamic subwatershed scale showed the strongest explanatory power for water quality indicators, with 91.2 % for the rainy season and 83.2 % for the dry season. The largest patch index of agricultural land (A_LPI) and water bodies (W_LPI) were identified as the most critical landscape indices influencing water quality at the dynamic sub-watershed scale, with threshold values for these indices established as A_LPI < 10 % and W_LPI > 1.5 %. These findings offer a comprehensive understanding of the spatiotemporal impacts of landscape patterns on water quality and offer valuable insights for watershed management and ecological planning.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 170
Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Suzhou University of Science and Technology (CN), University of California, Davis (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Wenzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.