Comparison between effect of chitosan and Nano-chitosan as feed additives on cultured tilapia nilotica fish (Oreochromis niloticus)

Aeromonas hydrophila, a common cause of disease outbreaks in various fish species, was isolated, biochemically and molecularly identified, and subjected to antimicrobial sensitivity tests. The isolates exhibited multiple resistances toward various antibiotics, so searching for an eco-friendly substitute is essential. Fish feed additives are used to combat potential diseases or stressors. Chitosan and its Nano scale materials, which are anticipated to have stronger immune stimulatory effects than conventional materials, are among these feed additives. Two experiments were performed to compare and assess the therapeutic and adverse impacts of chitosan (Ch) and chitosan-nanoparticles (ChNPs) and assess the efficacy of various treatments against A. hydrophila infection in Oreochromis niloticus. First experiment, O. niloticus (n=180; 26±2 g) were distributed into 3 groups each in triplicate (n=60 fish/group); CTR: negative control; Ch: chitosan (10 g/kg diet); and ChNPs: chitosan nanoparticles (100 mg/kg diet) for 4 weeks. No mortalities or significant negative impacts were noted in any groups. The dietary inclusion of Ch and ChNPs positively impacted fish growth performance, feed intake, hematological parameters, immune response, and antioxidant capacity. It significantly reduced the total aerobic bacterial count in fish flesh, demonstrating the immunostimulant and antibacterial effects of chitosan. Second experiment, each group from the first experiment was divided into 2 subgroups of 20 fish each (n=6 groups; 20 fish/group). CTR group subdivided into G1: infected control and G2: infected and treated with levofloxacin (LEV), Ch group subdivided into G3: infected-Ch and G4: infected-Ch+LEV, and ChNPs group subdivided into G5: infected- ChNPs; and G6: infected-ChNPs+LEV for 10 days. The hematological parameters of all the treated groups were closer to the CTR values in the 1st experiment than in the infected control group. Liver enzymes and kidney markers were lower in all treated fish. Immune responses were significantly greater (P≤0.05) in the Ch/ ChNP groups before and after challenge. The mortality rate decreased in the G6 group, followed by the G5 and G4 groups after infection. In conclusion, feeding O. niloticus a 10 g Ch or 100 mg ChNPs/kg diet improved growth performance and enhanced antioxidant capacity.

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Journal of Animal Health
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejah.2025.397208
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aquatic life and conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between effect of chitosan and Nano-chitosan as feed additives on cultured tilapia nilotica fish (Oreochromis niloticus)

1 citations
Egyptian Journal of Animal Health
Aquatic life and conservation
0.60
article

Comparison between effect of chitosan and Nano-chitosan as feed additives on cultured tilapia nilotica fish (Oreochromis niloticus)

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aeromonas hydrophila, a common cause of disease outbreaks in various fish species, was isolated, biochemically and molecularly identified, and subjected to antimicrobial sensitivity tests. The isolates exhibited multiple resistances toward various antibiotics, so searching for an eco-friendly substitute is essential. Fish feed additives are used to combat potential diseases or stressors. Chitosan and its Nano scale materials, which are anticipated to have stronger immune stimulatory effects than conventional materials, are among these feed additives. Two experiments were performed to compare and assess the therapeutic and adverse impacts of chitosan (Ch) and chitosan-nanoparticles (ChNPs) and assess the efficacy of various treatments against A. hydrophila infection in Oreochromis niloticus. First experiment, O. niloticus (n=180; 26±2 g) were distributed into 3 groups each in triplicate (n=60 fish/group); CTR: negative control; Ch: chitosan (10 g/kg diet); and ChNPs: chitosan nanoparticles (100 mg/kg diet) for 4 weeks. No mortalities or significant negative impacts were noted in any groups. The dietary inclusion of Ch and ChNPs positively impacted fish growth performance, feed intake, hematological parameters, immune response, and antioxidant capacity. It significantly reduced the total aerobic bacterial count in fish flesh, demonstrating the immunostimulant and antibacterial effects of chitosan. Second experiment, each group from the first experiment was divided into 2 subgroups of 20 fish each (n=6 groups; 20 fish/group). CTR group subdivided into G1: infected control and G2: infected and treated with levofloxacin (LEV), Ch group subdivided into G3: infected-Ch and G4: infected-Ch+LEV, and ChNPs group subdivided into G5: infected- ChNPs; and G6: infected-ChNPs+LEV for 10 days. The hematological parameters of all the treated groups were closer to the CTR values in the 1st experiment than in the infected control group. Liver enzymes and kidney markers were lower in all treated fish. Immune responses were significantly greater (P≤0.05) in the Ch/ ChNP groups before and after challenge. The mortality rate decreased in the G6 group, followed by the G5 and G4 groups after infection. In conclusion, feeding O. niloticus a 10 g Ch or 100 mg ChNPs/kg diet improved growth performance and enhanced antioxidant capacity.

Egyptian Journal of Animal HealthVol. 5(1)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Aquatic life and conservation
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison between effect of chitosan and Nano-chitosan as feed additives on cultured tilapia nilotica fish (Oreochromis niloticus) · Egyptian Journal of Animal Health (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS