Brain MRI volumetry and atrophy rating scales as predictors of amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a real-world memory clinic setting

Predicting amyloid status is crucial in light of upcoming disease-modifying therapies and the need to identify treatment-eligible patients with Alzheimer's disease. In our study, we aimed to predict CSF-amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a memory clinic by (I) comparing the performance of visual/automated rating scales and MRI volumetric analysis and (II) combining MRI volumetric data with neuropsychological tests and APOE4 status. Two hundred ninety patients underwent a comprehensive assessment. The cNeuro cMRI software (Combinostics Oy) provided automated computed rating scales and volumetric analysis. Amyloid status was determined using data-driven CSF biomarker cutoffs (Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio), and eligibility for anti-Aβ treatment was assessed according to recent recommendations published after the FDA approval of the anti-Aβ drug aducanumab. The automated rating scales and volumetric analysis demonstrated higher performance compared to visual assessment in predicting Aβ status, especially for parietal-GCA (AUC = 0.70), MTA (AUC = 0.66) scores, hippocampal (AUC = 0.68), and angular gyrus (AUC = 0.69) volumes, despite low global accuracy. When we combined hippocampal and angular gyrus volumes with RAVLT immediate recall and APOE4 status, we achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.82), which remained high even in predicting anti-Aβ treatment eligibility (AUC = 0.81). Our study suggests that automated analysis of atrophy rating scales and brain volumetry outperforms operator-dependent visual rating scales. When combined with neuropsychological and genetic information, this computerized approach may play a crucial role not only in a research context but also in a real-world memory clinic. This integration results in a high level of accuracy for predicting amyloid-CSF status and anti-Aβ treatment eligibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurology
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12853-9
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brain MRI volumetry and atrophy rating scales as predictors of amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a real-world memory clinic setting

Angelo Zilioli, Anna Matton, Rinkee Mohanty, Göran Hagman et al.
6 citations
Journal of Neurology
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
2.31
article

Brain MRI volumetry and atrophy rating scales as predictors of amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a real-world memory clinic setting

Angelo Zilioli, Anna Matton, Rinkee Mohanty, Göran Hagman, Anna Rosenberg, Tobias Granberg, Jyrki Lötjönen, Eric Westman, Miia Kivipelto
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Predicting amyloid status is crucial in light of upcoming disease-modifying therapies and the need to identify treatment-eligible patients with Alzheimer's disease. In our study, we aimed to predict CSF-amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a memory clinic by (I) comparing the performance of visual/automated rating scales and MRI volumetric analysis and (II) combining MRI volumetric data with neuropsychological tests and APOE4 status. Two hundred ninety patients underwent a comprehensive assessment. The cNeuro cMRI software (Combinostics Oy) provided automated computed rating scales and volumetric analysis. Amyloid status was determined using data-driven CSF biomarker cutoffs (Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio), and eligibility for anti-Aβ treatment was assessed according to recent recommendations published after the FDA approval of the anti-Aβ drug aducanumab. The automated rating scales and volumetric analysis demonstrated higher performance compared to visual assessment in predicting Aβ status, especially for parietal-GCA (AUC = 0.70), MTA (AUC = 0.66) scores, hippocampal (AUC = 0.68), and angular gyrus (AUC = 0.69) volumes, despite low global accuracy. When we combined hippocampal and angular gyrus volumes with RAVLT immediate recall and APOE4 status, we achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.82), which remained high even in predicting anti-Aβ treatment eligibility (AUC = 0.81). Our study suggests that automated analysis of atrophy rating scales and brain volumetry outperforms operator-dependent visual rating scales. When combined with neuropsychological and genetic information, this computerized approach may play a crucial role not only in a research context but also in a real-world memory clinic. This integration results in a high level of accuracy for predicting amyloid-CSF status and anti-Aβ treatment eligibility.

Journal of NeurologyVol. 272(1)
University of Parma (IT), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI), Imperial College London (GB)
EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Parkinson's Foundation, Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning, Hjärnfonden, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Vetenskapsrådet, Alzheimerfonden, Parkinsonfonden, Center for Innovative Medicine
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.