Evaluation of the Feasibility and Reliability of Arabic Multiple Choice Tests in Higher Education

Multiple-choice tests are commonly used in education, including at the higher education level, as an efficient method for evaluating students' understanding. In the context of Arabic language learning, multiple-choice tests are believed to be able to assess students' level of comprehension and mastery of the language. However, it is essential to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of these tests to ensure that the results accurately reflect students' abilities. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of multiple-choice tests in Arabic in higher education. The evaluation was conducted by assessing content validity, construct validity, reliability, and correlation with students' academic performance. The results showed that 60% of the test questions were aligned with the existing curriculum, although only 14 out of 25 questions met the criteria for construct validity. Despite some shortcomings in construct validity, the test demonstrated a high level of reliability, with a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.88, indicating consistent test results. Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between test scores and students' academic performance (r = 0.44), indicating that the test can reflect students' overall academic achievement. Despite certain limitations in construct validity, the conclusion of this study is that the multiple-choice test is still considered reliable as an evaluation tool. This conclusion provides insight into the test's effectiveness in measuring students' understanding and mastery of Arabic at the tertiary level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lisanudhad Jurnal Bahasa Pembelajaran dan Sastra Arab
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21111/lisanudhad.v11i2.12163
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Feasibility and Reliability of Arabic Multiple Choice Tests in Higher Education

M. Baihaqi, Zakiyah Zakiyah, Sulfiatin Sulfiatin, Nais Musyafaul Faiza et al.
1 links
Lisanudhad Jurnal Bahasa Pembelajaran dan Sastra Arab
Education and Islamic Studies
article

Evaluation of the Feasibility and Reliability of Arabic Multiple Choice Tests in Higher Education

M. Baihaqi, Zakiyah Zakiyah, Sulfiatin Sulfiatin, Nais Musyafaul Faiza, Muhammad Ilham Revo Alghani, Fatihuddin Fatihuddin
article en

Abstract

Multiple-choice tests are commonly used in education, including at the higher education level, as an efficient method for evaluating students' understanding. In the context of Arabic language learning, multiple-choice tests are believed to be able to assess students' level of comprehension and mastery of the language. However, it is essential to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of these tests to ensure that the results accurately reflect students' abilities. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of multiple-choice tests in Arabic in higher education. The evaluation was conducted by assessing content validity, construct validity, reliability, and correlation with students' academic performance. The results showed that 60% of the test questions were aligned with the existing curriculum, although only 14 out of 25 questions met the criteria for construct validity. Despite some shortcomings in construct validity, the test demonstrated a high level of reliability, with a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.88, indicating consistent test results. Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between test scores and students' academic performance (r = 0.44), indicating that the test can reflect students' overall academic achievement. Despite certain limitations in construct validity, the conclusion of this study is that the multiple-choice test is still considered reliable as an evaluation tool. This conclusion provides insight into the test's effectiveness in measuring students' understanding and mastery of Arabic at the tertiary level.

Lisanudhad Jurnal Bahasa Pembelajaran dan Sastra ArabVol. 11(2)
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Education and Islamic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.