Mapping soil drainage classes: Comparing expert knowledge and machine learning strategies

Soil drainage is an essential factor that influences plant growth and various biophysical processes, such as nutrient cycling and greenhouse gas fluxes. Therefore, soil drainage maps are fundamental tools for managing crops, forests, and the environment. This study compared two approaches to mapping soil drainage classes in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, using geographic information systems (GIS). The first approach employed expert knowledge (EK) to develop a simple model based on soil color and texture, while the second used machine learning (ML) with an extensive set of covariates and a decision tree algorithm. To evaluate the full, operational implementation of soil mapping, this study assessed the two approaches in terms of accuracy, labor efficiency, transferability, interpretability, and agreement/disagreement statistical methods. In terms of accuracy, the ML-based strategy showed greater agreement with the reference map (53 %) compared to the EK approach (50 %). However, the EK strategy was more time- and resource-efficient, as well as being more transferable and interpretable due to the simplicity of its rules based on soil properties. Given its higher interpretability and ease of application, the EK approach was recommended as the most suitable for operational soil drainage mapping in tropical environments. • Use of remote sensing and predictive models to map soil drainage classes. • Qualitative and statistical criteria for the assessment of prediction performance. • Two strategies for mapping soil drainage classes in Brazil were tested and rated. • The ML-based strategy had the highest soil drainage map accuracy. • In the selection criteria, the EK-based strategy received the best score.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Advances
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilad.2024.100028
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping soil drainage classes: Comparing expert knowledge and machine learning strategies

Danilo César de Mello, Bradley A. Miller, Marcos Rafael Nanni, Jorge Tadeu Fim Rosas et al.
5 citations
Soil Advances
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
1.03
article

Mapping soil drainage classes: Comparing expert knowledge and machine learning strategies

Danilo César de Mello, Bradley A. Miller, Marcos Rafael Nanni, Jorge Tadeu Fim Rosas, Gustavo Vieira Veloso, José Alexandre Melo Demattê, Nícolas Augusto Rosin, Renan Falcioni, Uemeson José dos Santos, Marcelo Rodrigo Alves, Elpídio Inácio Fernandes Filho, Nélida Elizabet Quiñonez Silvero, Jean Jesus Macedo Novais, Bruno dos Anjos Bartsch
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Soil drainage is an essential factor that influences plant growth and various biophysical processes, such as nutrient cycling and greenhouse gas fluxes. Therefore, soil drainage maps are fundamental tools for managing crops, forests, and the environment. This study compared two approaches to mapping soil drainage classes in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, using geographic information systems (GIS). The first approach employed expert knowledge (EK) to develop a simple model based on soil color and texture, while the second used machine learning (ML) with an extensive set of covariates and a decision tree algorithm. To evaluate the full, operational implementation of soil mapping, this study assessed the two approaches in terms of accuracy, labor efficiency, transferability, interpretability, and agreement/disagreement statistical methods. In terms of accuracy, the ML-based strategy showed greater agreement with the reference map (53 %) compared to the EK approach (50 %). However, the EK strategy was more time- and resource-efficient, as well as being more transferable and interpretable due to the simplicity of its rules based on soil properties. Given its higher interpretability and ease of application, the EK approach was recommended as the most suitable for operational soil drainage mapping in tropical environments. • Use of remote sensing and predictive models to map soil drainage classes. • Qualitative and statistical criteria for the assessment of prediction performance. • Two strategies for mapping soil drainage classes in Brazil were tested and rated. • The ML-based strategy had the highest soil drainage map accuracy. • In the selection criteria, the EK-based strategy received the best score.

Soil AdvancesVol. 3
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR), Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (BR), Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR), Iowa State University (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade do Oeste Paulista (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.