“Adding cayenne to curry”: Intertextuality, Transfictional Character and Sensational Parodies in Charles Reade and Dion Boucicault’s Foul Play (1868)

Both Charles Reade and Dion Boucicault were well-known in the nineteenth century as writers who adapted and re-fashioned across multiple sources and media. Foul Play (1868) brought these two successful cultural producers together and this article discusses their collaboration and its parodies as intertextual, transfictional, and transmedial enterprises. I suggest that sensational narratives like Foul Play are particularly alive to intertextual and transmedial strategies because the aims of both sensation writers and transmedial producers were aligned: creating affective bonds and encouraging increased engagement and consumption. This article explores three different versions of Foul Play (one novelistic and two dramatic) as well as the parodies that almost immediately followed. Examining transfictional characters and plot tropes across these productions reveals that transfictionality can have significant consequences on the distribution of power in a collaborative venture and on the scope and success of its cultural reverberations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Victorian Popular Fictions Journal
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46911/rvqo1957
Primary Topic
French Literature and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Adding cayenne to curry”: Intertextuality, Transfictional Character and Sensational Parodies in Charles Reade and Dion Boucicault’s Foul Play (1868)

Beth Palmer
Victorian Popular Fictions Journal
French Literature and Criticism
article

“Adding cayenne to curry”: Intertextuality, Transfictional Character and Sensational Parodies in Charles Reade and Dion Boucicault’s Foul Play (1868)

Beth Palmer
article en

Abstract

Both Charles Reade and Dion Boucicault were well-known in the nineteenth century as writers who adapted and re-fashioned across multiple sources and media. Foul Play (1868) brought these two successful cultural producers together and this article discusses their collaboration and its parodies as intertextual, transfictional, and transmedial enterprises. I suggest that sensational narratives like Foul Play are particularly alive to intertextual and transmedial strategies because the aims of both sensation writers and transmedial producers were aligned: creating affective bonds and encouraging increased engagement and consumption. This article explores three different versions of Foul Play (one novelistic and two dramatic) as well as the parodies that almost immediately followed. Examining transfictional characters and plot tropes across these productions reveals that transfictionality can have significant consequences on the distribution of power in a collaborative venture and on the scope and success of its cultural reverberations.

Victorian Popular Fictions JournalVol. 6(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
French Literature and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Adding cayenne to curry”: Intertextuality, Transfictional Character and Sensational Parodies in Charles Reade and Dion Boucicault’s Foul Play (1868) — Beth Palmer · Victorian Popular Fictions Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS