Large-scale remote sensing reveals that tree mortality in Germany appears to be greater than previously expected

Abstract Global warming poses a major threat to forests and events of increased tree mortality are observed globally. Studying tree mortality often relies on local-level observations of dieback while large-scale analyses are lacking. Satellite remote sensing provides the spatial coverage and sufficiently high temporal and spatial resolution needed to investigate tree mortality at landscape-scale. However, adequate reference data for training satellite-based models are scarce. In this study, we employed the first maps of standing deadwood in Germany for the years 2018–2022 with 10 m spatial resolution that were created by using tree mortality observations spotted in hundreds of drone images as the reference. We use these maps to study spatial and temporal patterns of tree mortality in Germany and analyse their biotic and abiotic environmental drivers using random forest regression. In 2019, the second consecutive hotter drought year in a row, standing deadwood increased steeply to 334 ± 189 kilohectar (kha) which corresponds to 2.5 ± 1.4% of the total forested area in Germany. Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris, and Fagus sylvatica showed highest shares of standing deadwood. During 2018–2021 978 ± 529 kha (7.9 ± 4.4%) of standing dead trees accumulated. The higher mortality estimates that we report compared to other surveys (such as the ground-based forest condition survey) can be partially attributed to the fact that remote sensing captures mortality from a bird’s eye perspective and that the high spatial detail (10 m) in this study also captures scattered occurrences of tree mortality. Atmospheric drought (i.e. climatic water balance and vapor pressure deficit) and temperature extremes (i.e. number of hot days and frosts after vegetation onset) were the most important predictors of tree mortality. We found increased tree mortality for smaller and younger stands and on less productive sites. Monospecific stands were generally not more affected by mortality than average, but only when interactions with damaging insects (e.g. bark beetles) occurred. Because excess tree mortality rates threaten many forests across the globe, similar analyses of tree mortality are warranted and technically feasible at the global scale. We encourage the international scientific community to share and compile local data on deadwood occurrences (see example: www.deadtrees.earth) as such a collaborative effort is required to help understand mortality events on a global scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpae062
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large-scale remote sensing reveals that tree mortality in Germany appears to be greater than previously expected

Teja Kattenborn, Sebastian Schmidtlein, Henrik A. Hartmann, Felix Schiefer et al.
5 citations
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
Forest Management and Policy
1.41
article

Large-scale remote sensing reveals that tree mortality in Germany appears to be greater than previously expected

Teja Kattenborn, Sebastian Schmidtlein, Henrik A. Hartmann, Felix Schiefer, Florian Schnabel
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Global warming poses a major threat to forests and events of increased tree mortality are observed globally. Studying tree mortality often relies on local-level observations of dieback while large-scale analyses are lacking. Satellite remote sensing provides the spatial coverage and sufficiently high temporal and spatial resolution needed to investigate tree mortality at landscape-scale. However, adequate reference data for training satellite-based models are scarce. In this study, we employed the first maps of standing deadwood in Germany for the years 2018–2022 with 10 m spatial resolution that were created by using tree mortality observations spotted in hundreds of drone images as the reference. We use these maps to study spatial and temporal patterns of tree mortality in Germany and analyse their biotic and abiotic environmental drivers using random forest regression. In 2019, the second consecutive hotter drought year in a row, standing deadwood increased steeply to 334 ± 189 kilohectar (kha) which corresponds to 2.5 ± 1.4% of the total forested area in Germany. Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris, and Fagus sylvatica showed highest shares of standing deadwood. During 2018–2021 978 ± 529 kha (7.9 ± 4.4%) of standing dead trees accumulated. The higher mortality estimates that we report compared to other surveys (such as the ground-based forest condition survey) can be partially attributed to the fact that remote sensing captures mortality from a bird’s eye perspective and that the high spatial detail (10 m) in this study also captures scattered occurrences of tree mortality. Atmospheric drought (i.e. climatic water balance and vapor pressure deficit) and temperature extremes (i.e. number of hot days and frosts after vegetation onset) were the most important predictors of tree mortality. We found increased tree mortality for smaller and younger stands and on less productive sites. Monospecific stands were generally not more affected by mortality than average, but only when interactions with damaging insects (e.g. bark beetles) occurred. Because excess tree mortality rates threaten many forests across the globe, similar analyses of tree mortality are warranted and technically feasible at the global scale. We encourage the international scientific community to share and compile local data on deadwood occurrences (see example: www.deadtrees.earth) as such a collaborative effort is required to help understand mortality events on a global scale.

Forestry An International Journal of Forest ResearchVol. 98(4)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Julius Kühn-Institut (DE), University of Freiburg (DE), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Forest Management and Policy
1.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.